I've just updated perl-Moose to 2. in rawhide.
As a basic test, I rebuilt all dependent packages against it in mock
and was pleasantly surprised to find only one real failure
(perl-MooseX-POE) which was fixed simply by updating to latest
upstream version. This says a lot about the quality of t
On 04/22/2011 03:23 PM, Iain Arnell wrote:
> I've just updated perl-Moose to 2. in rawhide.
>
> As a basic test, I rebuilt all dependent packages against it in mock
> and was pleasantly surprised to find only one real failure
> (perl-MooseX-POE) which was fixed simply by updating to latest
> u
2011/4/22 Marcela Mašláňová :
> On 04/22/2011 03:23 PM, Iain Arnell wrote:
>> I've just updated perl-Moose to 2. in rawhide.
[snip]
>> I've also just started a test rebuild of dependent packages in f15
>> against Moose 2.. Assuming no unexpected breakage, I plan to push
>> Moose 2. to f
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Iain Arnell wrote:
>
> There were several more failing builds in f15. All should be fixed
> with these updates:
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-MooseX-POE-0.213-1.fc15
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Action-REST-0.90-1.fc15
