On 01/11/2012 03:30 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset,
packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned.
comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages.
The list of orphaned packages is h
On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 04:36:24AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I was under the impression, it's the perl-sig's intention to have
packages which loose its primary maintainer, to be "colaboratively"
maintained. It's at least how I remember the situat
On 01/11/2012 09:26 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 04:36:24AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I was under the impression, it's the perl-sig's intention to have
packages which loose its primary maintainer, to be "colaboratively"
m
* Ralf Corsepius [11/01/2012 09:59] :
>
> Also, in cases nobody steps up and takes action, you (who is
> subscribed to the perl-list) could step up in any case.
If perl-sig is the maintainer, only provenpackagers will be able to commit.
Emmanuel
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:51:32AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 01/11/2012 09:26 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> >On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >>Note that the perl-sig pseudo-user could own the packages if the perl-sig
> >>wants to continue maintaining them and doesn't want
On 01/11/2012 10:07 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:51:32AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 01/11/2012 09:26 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Note that the perl-sig pseudo-user could own the packages if the perl-sig
wants to continue
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 06:01:03AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 01/11/2012 10:07 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:51:32AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >>On 01/11/2012 09:26 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> >>>On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Note that the
