[Bug 2351093] New: Perl modules fail and Packages cannot be installed and even perldoc -q installed fails

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2351093 Bug ID: 2351093 Summary: Perl modules fail and Packages cannot be installed and even perldoc -q installed fails Product: Fedora Version: 41 Hardware: x86_64

[Bug 2351093] Perl modules fail and Packages cannot be installed and even perldoc -q installed fails

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2351093 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2351093] Perl modules fail and Packages cannot be installed and even perldoc -q installed fails

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2351093 --- Comment #2 from Rex Arul --- (In reply to Jitka Plesnikova from comment #1) > This usually happens when you upgrade Fedora to a version with a newer Perl > release. > > The issue is that you're not using the perl-Encode package provided b

[Bug 2338799] Many core Perl modules are missing

installed by default. I see it on my systems and I never explicitly installed it.) It's not that Perl is so important. Fedora already installs a lot of Perl modules by default because it's useful to Fedora. I have used Perl with Fedora for over ten years and I didn't know that I neede

[Bug 2338799] Many core Perl modules are missing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2338799 --- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar --- (In reply to David Levner from comment #3) > I think Fedora would be improved by including a complete version of Perl by > default Do you mean being installed by default, or being available in Fedora reposi

[Bug 2338799] Many core Perl modules are missing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2338799 Michal Josef Spacek changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(davidlevner@yahoo |needinfo- |.com

[Bug 2338799] Many core Perl modules are missing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2338799 Michal Josef Spacek changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(davidlevner@yahoo

[Bug 2338799] Many core Perl modules are missing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2338799 --- Comment #4 from Dan Book --- It is normal for several modules not to be installed depending on the platform, you will not get these with a source or perl-build install either. Win32 modules are only installed on windows platforms, Amiga on

[Bug 2338799] Many core Perl modules are missing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2338799 --- Comment #3 from David Levner --- Thank you. Perl was installed (sort of) with Fedora 41 (KDE spin), probably as a dependency. It's a useful language; that's why someone, at some point, wrote Perl scripts that have been incorporated into Fe

[Bug 2338799] Many core Perl modules are missing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2338799 Dan Book changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gri...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Dan B

[Bug 2338799] Many core Perl modules are missing

CC||emman...@seyman.fr --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- (In reply to David Levner from comment #0) > > When I did a fresh install of Fedora 41 on a new computer, many core Perl > modules and programs were not installed. Nothing in the defaul

[Bug 2338799] New: Many core Perl modules are missing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2338799 Bug ID: 2338799 Summary: Many core Perl modules are missing Product: Fedora Version: 41 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: perl

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 Bug 1543336 depends on bug 2008832, which changed state. Bug 2008832 Summary: Upgrade libtomcrypt to ≥ 1.18.0 to support Adler32 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2008832 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 --- Comment #38 from Paul Howarth --- Now that we have (or will have shortly) fully CryptX-based versions of perl-Net-SSH-Perl in F-36, F-37 and all EPELs, it looks to me that there are no remaining dependents of perl-Crypt-RSA in Fedora (othe

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #37 from Fed

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #36 from

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Component|perl-Net-SSH|perl-Net-SSH-Perl Status|NEW

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 --- Comment #34 from Paul Howarth --- perl-Net-SSH-Perl-2.14-15.fc37 is now un-hobbled. Updates for F-36 and EPEL will follow in due course. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 --- Comment #33 from Paul Howarth --- Un-hobbled versions of perl-Net-SSH-Perl will need a new (to Fedora) package perl-Crypt-Curve25519 (Bug #2060852). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bug

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xav...@bachelot.org --- Comment #32

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 --- Comment #31 from Paul Howarth --- perl-Net-SSH-Perl for EPEL-9: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-bcd6155d50 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 --- Comment #30 from Paul Howarth --- perl-Net-SSH-Perl will be ready in EPEL-9 soon. All of the remaining dependencies are maintained by me so it should be available in testing in the next few days. -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 --- Comment #29 from Denis Fateyev --- Maybe it makes sense to bump the version to "epel9" and provide package(s) there. In this case, it will require much less efforts with backporting and upgrading, just providing all required packages in ep

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||2008832 Referenced Bugs: https://bugz

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 cornel panceac changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(cpanc...@gmail.co | |m)

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 --- Comment #27 from Petr Pisar --- It isn't. perl-CryptX requires a support for Adler32 (and many other algorithms) in libtomcrypt. EPEL's libtomcrypt-1.17-25.el7 does not support it. I asked its maintainer for an upgrade (bug #2008832). --

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 --- Comment #26 from Petr Pisar --- Available: perl-Convert-ASCII-Armour perl-File-Basename as perl perl-Term-ReadPassword Not available: perl-Class-Loader perl-Crypt-Blowfish perl-Crypt-Primes perl-Crypt-Random perl-Crypt-RSA perl-CryptX per

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 Denis Fateyev changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(cpanc...@gmail.co

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 --- Comment #24 from Paul Howarth --- $ rpm -q --whatprovides 'perl(File::Basename)' perl-interpreter-5.28.2-440.fc30.x86_64 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 cornel panceac changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(cpanc...@gmail.co | |m)

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 --- Comment #22 from Paul Howarth --- All current Fedora releases have a CryptX-based version of Net-SSH-Perl now, though most of the ECC-related functionality is missing as it was stripped out of perl-CryptX. Would that be OK for you if it w

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 Denis Fateyev changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(cpanc...@gmail.co

Re: Perl modules in EPEL 8

* Petr Pisar [23/08/2019 15:18] : > > If you add a normal non-modular package into EPEL, it will be built for Perl > 5.26. Koji knows what streams are default and packages of those streams are > added into Koji build root. Therefore Koji knows only perl-5.26.3 package, > installs it when build-requ

Perl modules in EPEL 8

.26 is default and that means that by default the Perl visible to YUM is Perl 5.26. There are few other Modularity modules that provide RPM packages that package some Perl modules from CPAN. This is the complete list: perl-App-cpanminus:1.7044 [d] perl-DBD-MySQL:4.046 [d] perl-DBD-Pg:3.7 [d] perl-DBD-S

[Bug 1662474] Cannot install all Perl modules correctly.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662474 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar --- Example for perl-JavaScript-Beautifier: bug #1662932. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- p

[Bug 1662474] Cannot install all Perl modules correctly.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662474 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1662474] New: Cannot install all Perl modules correctly.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662474 Bug ID: 1662474 Summary: Cannot install all Perl modules correctly. Product: Fedora Version: 28 Status: NEW Component: perl Assignee: jples...@redhat.com

Re: Perl modules looking for new owners

On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 10:36:06AM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 10:01:36 +0100 > Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 01:04:37PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > Over the years I've added a number of Perl modules to Fedo

Re: Perl modules looking for new owners

On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 10:01:36 +0100 Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 01:04:37PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > Over the years I've added a number of Perl modules to Fedora for > > apps I needed at the time. I've been doing a pretty awful job of >

Re: Perl modules looking for new owners

On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 01:04:37PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > Over the years I've added a number of Perl modules to Fedora for apps I > needed at the time. I've been doing a pretty awful job of maintaining > many of them though, as my need for most has gone away and I&

Re: Perl modules looking for new owners

On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 02:28:24PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > * Daniel P. Berrangé [06/06/2018 13:04] : > > > > Thus I'm looking for new primary owners for the following: > > > > perl-Array-Diff > > perl-Class-Field > > perl-Class-MethodMaker > > perl-Data-Section > > perl

Re: Perl modules looking for new owners

* Daniel P. Berrangé [06/06/2018 13:04] : > > Thus I'm looking for new primary owners for the following: > > perl-Array-Diff > perl-Class-Field > perl-Class-MethodMaker > perl-Data-Section > perl-Software-License I'll gladly take ownership of these packages. My FAS username is

Perl modules looking for new owners

Over the years I've added a number of Perl modules to Fedora for apps I needed at the time. I've been doing a pretty awful job of maintaining many of them though, as my need for most has gone away and I'm overworked with other stuff. Fortunately various people people in Perl SIG ha

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 --- Comment #18 from Petr Pisar --- It looks like 0.053 can be packaged if I disable ECC support. I will try that and put the package on review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 --- Comment #17 from Petr Pisar --- I don't think this ever happen. CryptX author always develops on his libtomcrypt fork. I'd rather try packaging an older CryptX version that could work with upstream libtomcrypt. I don't think it's wise to b

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 --- Comment #15 from Jitka Plesnikova --- I requested new branch and built these packages for EPEL 7. I am maintainer of them. perl-Convert-ASCII-Armour-1.4-32.el7 perl-Net-SSH-0.09-26.el7 perl-Term-ReadPassword-0.11-27.el7 The other package

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 --- Comment #14 from Petr Pisar --- The cofactor is being added in . Not yet in the master branch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 --- Comment #13 from Petr Pisar --- (In reply to Denis Fateyev from comment #11) > Libtomcrypt recently had a new release: > https://github.com/libtom/libtomcrypt/releases > Though I don't know whether it includes all the requirements now, bu

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 --- Comment #12 from Petr Pisar --- Even If I disable/comment all these additional bindings and typemaps, I still get mismatch in on struct ltc_ecc_set_type. The bundled structure has additional members (A, cofactor, oid) and the binding code

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 Denis Fateyev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||de...@fateyev.com --- Comment #11 fro

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 --- Comment #10 from Petr Pisar --- CryptX-0.057 not only bundles libtomcrypt, it also patches it to add implementations for IDEA, SERPENT, SALSA20, SOSEMANUK, and RABBIT stream ciphers. And then it require their implementation in CryptX.xs un

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 --- Comment #9 from cornel panceac --- I was able to hunt the dependencies and rebuild those two modules but it still would be nice to have this already available in upstream. Thank you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on th

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com --- Comment #8 from

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 --- Comment #7 from cornel panceac --- perl-Term-ReadPassword rebuild worked also. so indeed we're left with perl-Net-SSH-Perl and its dependencies. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 --- Comment #6 from cornel panceac --- (In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #4) > Some of these dependencies are coming from perl-Net-SSH-Perl. Currently we > have an old version of this in Fedora because the current version replaces a > lot

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 --- Comment #5 from cornel panceac --- Blowfish rebuild worked (from f19). New required packages for me: perl-Class-Loader perl-Convert-ASCII-Armour perl-Crypt-Primes perl-Crypt-Random perl-Tie-EncryptedHash -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@city-fan.org --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 --- Comment #3 from cornel panceac --- Additional modules missing for me : perl-Crypt-Blowfish perl-Crypt-RSA perl-Math-Pari perl-Test-YAML-Meta perl-Text-SpellChecker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the b

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 --- Comment #2 from cornel panceac --- hmmm, it seems that File::Basename is actually builtin. Still checking :( -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 --- Comment #1 from cornel panceac --- On the other hand, maybe i/we should try to rebuild F19 modules because these share the perl version (5.16) with C7. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _

[Bug 1543336] New: please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 Bug ID: 1543336 Summary: please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel7 Component: perl-Net-SSH Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter

Re: Installing all core Perl modules by perl package

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 01:52:40PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > Therefore I offered them that Fedora can make "dnf install perl" working as > thay want and it will be implemented by renaming perl-core to perl and > giving a new name to present perl package. > > Thus I created this Fedora Change >

Re: Installing all core Perl modules by perl package

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 7:52 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > > Therefore I offered them that Fedora can make "dnf install perl" working as > thay want and it will be implemented by renaming perl-core to perl and > giving a new name to present perl package. > > Thus I created this Fedora Change >

Re: Installing all core Perl modules by perl package

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 02:25:05PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote: > Looking at the IRC backlog, I don't think this will actually > solve the issue; it will only install the full Perl when you > explicitly type "dnf install perl". If parts of Perl get pulled > in as dependencies of something else, the s

Re: Installing all core Perl modules by perl package

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 01:52:41PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > Hello, > > as you know Fedora's perl package does not provide all core modules. Fedora > has > perl-core package for that. As you probably know, this is not welcomed by some > people. They expect "perl" package means Perl. > > I had a

Installing all core Perl modules by perl package

Hello, as you know Fedora's perl package does not provide all core modules. Fedora has perl-core package for that. As you probably know, this is not welcomed by some people. They expect "perl" package means Perl. I had a chat with some people from #perl channel ragarding this topic on #fedora-pe

License change in 4 perl modules

A number of perl modules have changed licenses, all moving from GPLv3+ to the Perl license (ie GPL+ or Artistic). These modules are: - perl-Test-Type - perl-Test-Dist-VersionSync - perl-Queue-DBI - perl-Data-Validate-Type Packages with the new license will hit rawhide today. Emmanuel

ppisar changed lef's branch request for perl-Text-Tabs+Wrap in epel7 from Pending to Blocked with message: The Test::Tabs and Text::Wrap Perl modules are delivered by perl-5.16.3-291.el7 package. Use

ppisar changed lef's branch request for perl-Text-Tabs+Wrap in epel7 from Pending to Blocked with message: The Test::Tabs and Text::Wrap Perl modules are delivered by perl-5.16.3-291.el7 package. Use "yum install 'perl(Text::Tabs)' 'per(Text::Wrap)'&q

ppisar pushed to perl-MongoDB (master). "Unbundle Perl modules"

From 7a1d7b2614491a69e9977d358364c854ba8a3736 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:58:19 +0100 Subject: Unbundle Perl modules --- perl-MongoDB.spec | 25 ++--- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git

[Bug 197460] libgtk-java package errantly "provides" perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197460 Bug 197460 depends on bug 202210, which changed state. Bug 202210 Summary: Errorneously detected perl provides https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202210 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 1067003] Review Request: perl-Time-ParseDate - Perl modules for parsing dates and time

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.11 |perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.11

[Bug 1067003] Review Request: perl-Time-ParseDate - Perl modules for parsing dates and time

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.11 |perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.11

[Bug 1067003] Review Request: perl-Time-ParseDate - Perl modules for parsing dates and time

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1067003] Review Request: perl-Time-ParseDate - Perl modules for parsing dates and time

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003 --- Comment #22 from Petr Pisar --- I've blocked perl-Time-modules in F21. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=WiBRdNUBtj&a=cc_unsubsc

[Bug 1067003] Review Request: perl-Time-ParseDate - Perl modules for parsing dates and time

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because

[Bug 1067003] Review Request: perl-Time-ParseDate - Perl modules for parsing dates and time

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003 --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla --- Complete. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FfVNl7vcYM&a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SI

[Bug 1067003] Review Request: perl-Time-ParseDate - Perl modules for parsing dates and time

Pisar --- (In reply to Denis Fateyev from comment #12) > New Package SCM Request > === > Package Name: perl-Time-ParseDate > Short Description: Perl modules for parsing dates and time > Owners: dfateyev ppisar xavierb > Branches: f19 f20 el5 el6 epel7 > Ini

[Bug 1067003] Review Request: perl-Time-ParseDate - Perl modules for parsing dates and time

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003 --- Comment #19 from Denis Fateyev --- Unpushed and deleted update for 'EL6' branch since it conflicts with the base package `perl-Time-modules` (we overlooked this earlier). See #1116852 for details. -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1067003] Review Request: perl-Time-ParseDate - Perl modules for parsing dates and time

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fed

[Bug 1067003] Review Request: perl-Time-ParseDate - Perl modules for parsing dates and time

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.el5 -- You are receiving this mail b

[Bug 1067003] Review Request: perl-Time-ParseDate - Perl modules for parsing dates and time

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.el6 -- You are receiving this mail b

[Bug 1067003] Review Request: perl-Time-ParseDate - Perl modules for parsing dates and time

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail bec

[Bug 1067003] Review Request: perl-Time-ParseDate - Perl modules for parsing dates and time

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail bec

[Bug 1067003] Review Request: perl-Time-ParseDate - Perl modules for parsing dates and time

: |perl-Time-ParseDate - Perl |perl-Time-ParseDate - Perl |modules for parsing dates |modules for parsing dates |and times |and time -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https

[Bug 1067003] Review Request: perl-Time-ParseDate - Perl modules for parsing dates and times

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1a2pBxgm22&a=cc_unsubscrib

[Bug 1067003] Review Request: perl-Time-ParseDate - Perl modules for parsing dates and times

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this m

[Bug 1067003] Review Request: perl-Time-ParseDate - Perl modules for parsing dates and times

Denis Fateyev --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Time-ParseDate Short Description: Perl modules for parsing dates and time Owners: dfateyev ppisar xavierb Branches: f19 f20 el5 el6 epel7 InitialCC: perl-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1067003] Review Request: perl-Time-ParseDate - Perl modules for parsing dates and times

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |perl-Ti

[Bug 1051598] Perl scripts misidentified as perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051598 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1051598] Perl scripts misidentified as perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051598 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fed

[Bug 1051598] Perl scripts misidentified as perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051598 Todd Zullinger changed: What|Removed |Added CC||t...@pobox.com --- Comment #11 from

[Bug 1051598] Perl scripts misidentified as perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051598 Todd Zullinger changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1026760 Referenced Bugs: https://b

[Bug 1051598] Perl scripts misidentified as perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051598 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- file-5.14-14.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/file-5.14-14.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the b

[Bug 1051598] Perl scripts misidentified as perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051598 Jan Kaluža changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #9 from Jan Kaluža

[Bug 1051598] Perl scripts misidentified as perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051598 --- Comment #8 from Peter Oliver --- (In reply to Jan Kaluža from comment #5) > No, I really mean 317. Awk/HTML patterns in File are stronger than "Perl > module" pattern. That means that if Perl file contains "BEGIN {" or HTML > keywords, Fil

[Bug 1051598] Perl scripts misidentified as perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051598 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||perl-devel@lists.fedoraproj

  1   2   >