At 17:36 +0530 12/17/02, Aravind Srivaths wrote:
> I'm not sure I understand what the problem is here or what you're
> trying to achieve or point out. Could you elaborate?
Ok, let me start with a question instead - is it possible for two
instances of the interpreter to hold one reference each t
Thanks for the response.
> >Instead, is it not possible to just increment the reference count
> >of every variable by overloading its clone method. The destructor
> >can then reduce the reference count. I don't know
> >enough about cloning to figure out if this will work yet. Perhaps
> >the is
