At 08:31 + 9/23/03, Steve Schein wrote:
> In general, increment on a shared variable is not safe. It's safe in
the sense that Perl won't crash. It's _not_ save in the sense that
you might miss increments. This is because shared variables in Perl
are implemented as tied variables, i.e. wi
> In general, increment on a shared variable is not safe. It's safe in
> the sense that Perl won't crash. It's _not_ save in the sense that
> you might miss increments. This is because shared variables in Perl
> are implemented as tied variables, i.e. with a FETCH and STORE. An
> incremen
At 16:25 +0200 9/23/03, Per Buer wrote:
I am getting quite a lot warnings from forks.pm;
Use of uninitialized value in array element at
/usr/lib/perl5/forks.pm line 1143.
Use of uninitialized value in array element at
/usr/lib/perl5/forks.pm line 1156.
Use of uninitialized value in array element
At 16:25 +0200 9/23/03, Per Buer wrote:
I am getting quite a lot warnings from forks.pm;
Use of uninitialized value in array element at
/usr/lib/perl5/forks.pm line 1143.
Use of uninitialized value in array element at
/usr/lib/perl5/forks.pm line 1156.
Use of uninitialized value in array element
Hi,
I am getting quite a lot warnings from forks.pm;
Use of uninitialized value in array element at /usr/lib/perl5/forks.pm line 1143.
Use of uninitialized value in array element at /usr/lib/perl5/forks.pm line 1156.
Use of uninitialized value in array element at /usr/lib/perl5/forks.pm line 1143
On tirsdag 23 september 2003, 15:16, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
> > How
> >about "$foo = scalar keys %HASH"? Should a wrap access to shared lists
> >and hashed with tie and lock there?
>
> I'm not sure what you mean here...
Oops. Should have been "Should _I_ wrap ...". I just want to count the nu
At 13:52 +0200 9/23/03, Per Andreas Buer wrote:
I've playing around with forks and forks::shared for some time now - it
looks really nifty. In the past I've been spending too much time
emulating threads in Perl. :/
I am not quite sure when I need to lock. Is "$HASH{foo}++" safe?
In general, increme
Hi.
I've playing around with forks and forks::shared for some time now - it
looks really nifty. In the past I've been spending too much time
emulating threads in Perl. :/
I am not quite sure when I need to lock. Is "$HASH{foo}++" safe? How
about "$foo = scalar keys %HASH"? Should a wrap access t
