Hi,
On Wednesday, 19. September 2012, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> In playing with Net::LDAP::Util it became apparent that it is not compliant
> with RFC4514, but instead complies with the older RFC2253. Specifically
> where #'s in DNs are concerned. Currently it's expecting # followed by hex
>
Hi Quanah,
On Thursday, 20. September 2012, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Thursday, September 20, 2012 9:34 AM +0200 Peter Marschall
> >
> > Feedback is very welcome
>
> Thanks Peter! Should I look at this or perl-ldap 0.48? ;)
At this _and_ perl-ldap 0.48 ;-)
These changes are not part of
--On Thursday, September 20, 2012 9:34 AM +0200 Peter Marschall
wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday, 19. September 2012, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
In playing with Net::LDAP::Util it became apparent that it is not
compliant with RFC4514, but instead complies with the older RFC2253.
Specifically where #'
Hi,
On Wednesday, 19. September 2012, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> In playing with Net::LDAP::Util it became apparent that it is not compliant
> with RFC4514, but instead complies with the older RFC2253. Specifically
> where #'s in DNs are concerned. Currently it's expecting # followed by hex
>
In playing with Net::LDAP::Util it became apparent that it is not compliant
with RFC4514, but instead complies with the older RFC2253. Specifically
where #'s in DNs are concerned. Currently it's expecting # followed by hex
digits. This may not be the case once RFC4514 LDIF is in use.
An exa
