On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:14:41PM -0600, Joel Noble wrote:
> p.s. - I experimented with using the 'ldapsearch' binary command-line
[...]
Oops, sorry -- I duplicated that paragraph while editing.
Joel Noble
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I have been using Net::LDAPS successfully on a project to create
a web interface to an internal LDAP employee directory. The site
is in an Apache mod-perl environment, with one web page view
potentially causing several LDAP searches. (If more than one record is
returned, I show a lis
On 6/9/05 7:51, Sagar Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Certainly. Please see the attached. Hopefully what I've said is a fair
> summary, no doubt various people will view the issue in different ways.
> Couldn't figure out what the standard wrapping width was looked like
> there were inconsistenci
On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 20:51 -0500, Graham Barr wrote:
> > Are you pretty certain that pure-perl optimisations/changes cannot
> > get a
> > comparible speedup?
>
> Certain.
That's good enough for me. Thanks for confirming.
> > If you are then fair enough - but perhaps the Net::LDAP FAQ should
On Sep 1, 2005, at 08:28 AM, Sagar R. Shah wrote:
Why does it 'make sense' to deviate from pure perl? I'm not
disputing that
doing it in C would probably be faster, but you seem to be implying
that
there are not enough pure perl optimisations that can be done to get a
comprarable speed-up.
On 31/8/05 3:08, Sagar R. Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Graham,
>
> I'm trying to bring a large Perl application out of the dark ages and as
> part of this need to migrate from the existing Perl LDAP module (Ldapp -
> based on Ldapc) to Net::LDAP.
>
> What I've found though is that the pe
ext Sagar R. Shah ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Why does it 'make sense' to deviate from pure perl? I'm not disputing that
> doing it in C would probably be faster, but you seem to be implying that
> there are not enough pure perl optimisations that can be done to get a
> comprarable speed-up.
L
> ext Sagar R. Shah ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>
>> I decided to investigate further and profiled a script that obtained all
>> the LDAP attributes for a specific userid 500 times. Here's the profiler
>> output:
>>
>> $ dprofpp tmon.out
>> Total Elapsed Time = 27.01739 Seconds
>> User+System Tim
ext Sagar R. Shah ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> I decided to investigate further and profiled a script that obtained all
> the LDAP attributes for a specific userid 500 times. Here's the profiler
> output:
>
> $ dprofpp tmon.out
> Total Elapsed Time = 27.01739 Seconds
> User+System Time = 20.4
Hi Graham,
I'm trying to bring a large Perl application out of the dark ages and as
part of this need to migrate from the existing Perl LDAP module (Ldapp -
based on Ldapc) to Net::LDAP.
What I've found though is that the performance of Net::LDAP is around
seven times worse than the old solution
10 matches
Mail list logo
