On Feb 9, 10:09am, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 09:22:57AM -0500, Colin Murtaugh wrote:
> > I can try that. I know that if I just open a file and do a "while
> > ()" loop to read it, it blocks when there's no input. That's fine
> > as long as that file is the only source of
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 09:22:57AM -0500, Colin Murtaugh wrote:
> I can try that. I know that if I just open a file and do a "while
> ()" loop to read it, it blocks when there's no input. That's fine
> as long as that file is the only source of events, but I want to have
> others as well.
Yah
I can try that. I know that if I just open a file and do a "while
()" loop to read it, it blocks when there's no input. That's fine
as long as that file is the only source of events, but I want to have
others as well.
Thanks-
Colin
On Fri, 2002-02-08 at 21:45, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> On
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 03:37:17PM -0500, Colin Murtaugh wrote:
> I'm trying to use Event.pm to do some pretty basic event handling
> (watching for incoming data on a named pipe, and eventually some timers)
> but I keep having trouble with CPU usage. Seems that once the loop
> starts, my script u
Hi --
I'm trying to use Event.pm to do some pretty basic event handling
(watching for incoming data on a named pipe, and eventually some timers)
but I keep having trouble with CPU usage. Seems that once the loop
starts, my script uses all available cpu. The script I'm using to test
with is belo
