Event::Stats 0.7 test max.t failure on WinXP SP2/perl 5.8 AS

2006-02-19 Thread eyck
Hello, it waits endlessly in max.t line 25, when I enable debug it looks like this: Event: multiplex 0.0989s at t\max.t line 25 Event: multiplex -0.3664s at t\max.t line 25 -- Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294 05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9 Total Existance Failure

[[email protected]: Event 0.86 fails make test]

2003-01-14 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
- Forwarded message from "Paul J. Kissman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: "Paul J. Kissman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Event 0.86 fails make test I am trying to install Event-0.86 on a Redhat system with Perl 5.8.0 and have encountere

[[email protected]: Event.pm 0.86 failed test t/var]

2002-12-06 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
- Forwarded message from Andreas Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Andreas Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Event.pm 0.86 failed test t/var X-Authenticated-Sender: #[EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Authenticated-IP: [213.6.105.145] X-Flags: 0001 Joshua, I j

Re: Test script with Event-0.86 + BSD::Resource-1.15 coredumps on some IRIX machines

2002-05-27 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 02:33:01AM -0400, Allen Smith wrote: > I'm holding my head over this one. A combination of Event-0.86 and > BSD::Resource 1.15 coredumps with the following test.pl script: > > [..snip..] > > The change that I'm guessing is responsible (although I really don't know > how) is

Test script with Event-0.86 + BSD::Resource-1.15 coredumps on some IRIX machines

2002-05-26 Thread Allen Smith
I'm holding my head over this one. A combination of Event-0.86 and BSD::Resource 1.15 coredumps with the following test.pl script: # -*- perl -*- use BSD::Resource; use Event qw(loop unloop sweep); $Event::DebugLevel = 4; $count = 0; Event->timer(interval=> "1", cb=>sub{$count++;

Re: test

2001-09-01 Thread Joshua Pritikin
Can the list admin please add <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list? It seems like my mail is being dropped because i'm sending from smtp.eth.net. _ Thank you for choosing LinuxQuestions. http://www.linuxquestions.o

test

2001-08-31 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
Am i on the list? -- Get self-realization at ... ? Victory to the Divine Mother!!

Fwd: Event-0.81 t/io.t fails test 6 and 7

2001-03-14 Thread Joshua Pritikin
*** There is an attachment in this mail. *** _ Thank you for choosing LinuxQuestions. http://www.linuxquestions.org I've been investigating your Event loop module. The module is failing tests 6 and 7 of io/t. Everything else p

Re: callback test fails

2001-01-31 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 12:01:07PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > JNP> Do you $idle->min(0) ? > > nope. Please do! The default is *not* zero! (It is 0.01 sec.) > i wasn't sure if that was what i needed. i need only one triggered > event perl plain/idle event. i would have to cancel each

Re: callback test fails

2001-01-31 Thread Uri Guttman
> "JNP" == Joshua N Pritikin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JNP> Do you $idle->min(0) ? nope. i wasn't sure if that was what i needed. i need only one triggered event perl plain/idle event. i would have to cancel each idle event as it is triggered which is ok. JNP> Please calm down, i'm s

Re: callback test fails

2001-01-31 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 12:26:14AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > JNP> i think the fix is trivial. Please confirm. > > this fixes the test bug. Good. i'll upload 0.81 shortly. > but i still notice a delay in dispatching idle > events. maybe i am not thinking about

Re: callback test fails

2001-01-30 Thread Uri Guttman
gt;> noticing this bug and are having problems with doing installs using >> CPAN.pm. they are using the force option. JNP> i think the fix is trivial. Please confirm. this fixes the test bug. but i still notice a delay in dispatching idle events. maybe i am not thinking about them t

Re: callback test fails

2001-01-30 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 12:07:58PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > i haven't tried the patch you sent me but i should. Yes please. > but others are > noticing this bug and are having problems with doing installs using > CPAN.pm. they are using the force option. i think the fix is trivial. Pl

callback test fails

2001-01-29 Thread Uri Guttman
josh, someone on c.l.p.misc just posted the same failure of test 5/6 of callback. Thx ... Event::timer should do the job. But I've got one problem with installing these modules. make test fails with the follwing message: t/callback..ok 6/6FAILED t

Re: event fails test 5 in callback

2001-01-10 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 12:37:25PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > just updated to event .80 on both solaris and linux. they both show a > failure of test 5 of the callback tests. this of course makes CPAN.pm > fail to install without force. Test 5 of callback looks suspicious. Ca

Re: event fails test 5 in callback

2001-01-10 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 04:15:05PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > hmm, i seem to be experiencing a problem with idle events in > stem. somehow the events are being delivered after a fraction of a > second delay. is this test related to idle? the tests are all timers > with a dela

Re: event fails test 5 in callback

2000-12-20 Thread Jochen Stenzel
Hello, Uri, > Event.pm v0.80 same here > # uname -a > SunOS zzz.zzz.com 5.7 Generic_106541-12 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10 # uname -a SunOS name 5.7 Generic_106541-10 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10 Almost equal, except of the kernel jumbo patch. Let's see, we have a system with kernel jumbo patc

Re: event fails test 5 in callback

2000-12-19 Thread Uri Guttman
well, i have some confirmation of this bug or whatever. someone else has the exact same config and the same callback test fails. here is the config: Event.pm v0.80 # uname -a SunOS zzz.zzz.com 5.7 Generic_106541-12 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10 # gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib

Re: event fails test 5 in callback

2000-12-19 Thread Uri Guttman
>>>>> "JS" == Jochen Stenzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JS> Which version of Solaris do you run? >> >> solaris 7 and linux 2.2.16-3 JS> This is mysterious. I just rerun the tests on Solaris 2.7 (with perl5.00503) JS> and could per

Re: event fails test 5 in callback

2000-12-19 Thread Jochen Stenzel
> JS> Which version of Solaris do you run? > > solaris 7 and linux 2.2.16-3 This is mysterious. I just rerun the tests on Solaris 2.7 (with perl5.00503) and could perform them successfully. > i can't grok the test code to see what test 5 is. it seems to > dynamically g

Re: event fails test 5 in callback

2000-12-19 Thread Uri Guttman
>>>>> "JS" == Jochen Stenzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> just updated to event .80 on both solaris and linux. they both show a >> failure of test 5 of the callback tests. JS> hm, it passes all tests here on Solaris 5.6 with both perl5

Re: event fails test 5 in callback

2000-12-19 Thread Jochen Stenzel
Hello, Uri, > just updated to event .80 on both solaris and linux. they both show a > failure of test 5 of the callback tests. hm, it passes all tests here on Solaris 5.6 with both perl5.005 and perl 5.6 ... is there something special on your platform? Which version of Solaris do y

event fails test 5 in callback

2000-12-19 Thread Uri Guttman
just updated to event .80 on both solaris and linux. they both show a failure of test 5 of the callback tests. this of course makes CPAN.pm fail to install without force. make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/local/bin/perl -Iblib/arch -Iblib/lib -I/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.00503/sun4-solaris -I/usr

Re: Event 0.72 blocks in test suite with perl 5.6

2000-03-24 Thread Jochen Stenzel
> Fixed. See 0.73. Great! I'll try it. Thank you! Jochen

Re: Event 0.72 blocks in test suite with perl 5.6

2000-03-24 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
On Fri, Mar 24, 2000 at 10:24:14AM -0500, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > I am able to reproduce it...investigating... Fixed. See 0.73. -- "Never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by stupidity." via, but not speaking for Deutsche Bank Change 3135 by joshua@j

Re: Event 0.72 blocks in test suite with perl 5.6

2000-03-24 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
I am able to reproduce it...investigating... -- "Never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by stupidity." via, but not speaking for Deutsche Bank

Re: Event 0.72 blocks in test suite with perl 5.6

2000-03-24 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
On Fri, Mar 24, 2000 at 01:05:13PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I just installed perl 5.6 and tried to reinstall Event 0.72. It hangs in > the loop test. Here is what it says with activated traces: Ugh. Here is the correct output for 5.6.0. I'm not sure why it isn't worki

Event 0.72 blocks in test suite with perl 5.6

2000-03-24 Thread Jochen Stenzel
Hello, I just installed perl 5.6 and tried to reinstall Event 0.72. It hangs in the loop test. Here is what it says with activated traces: - snip -- t/loop..creating Event::idle desc='early' Event::Watcher::init('Event::idle=HASH(0x1a11ac)', 'HASH(0

Problem with Event-tcp-0.13 test.

2000-02-23 Thread Rob Simmonds
Hi, I have installed Event-0.69 and Event-tcp-0.13 on a RH6.1 Linux system using a threading version of Perl. I have had a problem running the test that comes with Event-tcp-0.13. It starts, prints the lines appended to this mail and then hangs until it is killed. Any help you can give me

Re: bug in hup.t test for Event.pm

2000-02-04 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 11:44:14PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If I make the small change of putting the line > > use Test; plan test => 1; > > above the Use Event lines, as it is in the other tests, the module will now pass >test. > > The version from

bug in hup.t test for Event.pm

2000-02-03 Thread Conrad Heiney
I am unable to make Event.pm pass test without making a small change in the t/hup.t test. In the form downloaded from CPAN, the module fails test on my Debian Linux potato machine in the following way: t/hup...Undefined subroutine &Exporter::VERSION called at /usr/local