Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, it wasn't clear to the perl-qa folks that I'm talking about
> Perl5, not Perl6.
>
> No nonononono. Please don't drag CPAN into this particular
> conversation. I'm just trying to nail down p5p on this simple issue.
>
> Sorry for not c
Sorry, it wasn't clear to the perl-qa folks that I'm talking about
Perl5, not Perl6.
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 10:43:12PM +, David Grove wrote:
> I do, however, think that it would be a good absolute to have a
> requirement of standard internal documentation, not just for the
> core, but to CP
Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to propose two simple critereon for all future module
> additions to the core:
>
> 1) It has a reasonable amount of POD documentation. At minimum it
> must have something, even if its just a NAME, SYNOPSIS and
> DESCRIPTION.
This is
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 11:52:12AM +0200, Johan Vromans wrote:
> Personally, I'd like to impose these to any CPAN submission
> whatsoever...
Let's not dig into that 55-gallon drum of man-eating nightcrawlers
here, K?
As for below, I'd do this as a two-stage process. First, let's all
agree that
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 01:54:31AM +0100, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 07:21:47PM -0500, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> > > Net::Ping
> >
> > Maybe hard to test anything meaningful portably.
>
> localhost is always an option, no? If nothing else we can make sure
> an object c
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 01:54:31AM +0100, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> At minimum, everything should at least have a "do I compile and export
> the documented interface" test.
>
> Curmudgeon's anti-excuses follow.
Pumpkin's anti-anti-excuses follow.
> > > CGI::Carp
> > > CGI::Cookie
> > > CGI::Pu
> System dependent. Similar issues as with User::
>
> > PerlIO
>
> Err, nothing much would work in bleadperl if PerlIO didn't since
> it's the "stdio" layer...
PerlIO::Scalar and PerlIO::Via could use tests, though.
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologis
At minimum, everything should at least have a "do I compile and export
the documented interface" test.
Curmudgeon's anti-excuses follow.
On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 07:21:47PM -0500, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> > CPAN (since I know the CPAN version has tests)
>
> Yes, rather network
Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 10:32:35PM +0100, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>> filetest
> System dependent, requires filesystems with ACLs.
Even if we had tests that would just be skipped if Perl wasn't being built
under a path starting with /afs, there ar
Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd like to propose two simple critereon for all future module
> additions to the core:
> [two simple critereon follow]
Personally, I'd like to impose these to any CPAN submission
whatsoever...
For modules to be part of the core the requirements c
On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 10:32:35PM +0100, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> After patching up 1_compile.t, I now have a fairly accurate list of
> all the modules which are never even mentioned in the tests. They are
> listed below. Its a little over a third of the whole distribution
> (I'm not counting
11 matches
Mail list logo
