ANNOUNCE Test::Simple 0.17 can_ok(), isa_ok()

2001-08-29 Thread Michael G Schwern
0.17 Wed Aug 29 20:16:28 EDT 2001 * Added can_ok() and isa_ok() to Test::More can_ok can_ok($module, @methods); Checks to make sure the $module can do these @methods (works with functions, too). can_ok('Foo', qw(this that whatever))

Re: Try this one instead - patch for avhv.t

2001-08-29 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 12:27:40PM -0400, Joe McMahon wrote: > I didn't send the one that uses Test::More, which was really silly because > the one I sent doesn't work (left out one test)! Ooooh, much better. Test::More should be safe here, it doesn't use pseudohashes. > ! ok($a->{'abc'} eq 'A

Re: avhv.t - adding ok()

2001-08-29 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 11:16:44AM -0400, Joe McMahon wrote: > Here's a patch for op/avhv.t ro remove the 'print "not "' in bleadperl. > You wanted us to send them to you, not to p5p, right? Ayep. Thanks! A few critiques... First, use unified diff (diff -u). Easier for me to read. Sun's diff

Re: ANNOUNCE Testing SDK

2001-08-29 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 10:57:00PM +0900, Tatsuhiko Miyagawa wrote: > What's wrong with Bundle::*? Bundles require a working and configured CPAN shell, which many people do not or can not have. Also, you can't specify exact version requirements with a bundle, just dependencies. So if one of the

Re: ANNOUNCE Pod::Tests is now Test::Inline

2001-08-29 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 07:51:18AM -0400, Barrie Slaymaker wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 01:51:48AM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote: > > > > First, the syntax for the code examples has changed. Instead of > > "=also begin/end example" it's "=for example begin/end". This doesn't > > cause exis

avhv.t - adding ok()

2001-08-29 Thread Joe McMahon
Here's a patch for op/avhv.t ro remove the 'print "not "' in bleadperl. You wanted us to send them to you, not to p5p, right? --- Joe M. *** avhv.t Wed Aug 29 10:59:00 2001 --- avhv.t.new Wed Aug 29 10:56:40 2001 *** *** 19,24 --- 19,38 print "1..29\n"

Try this one instead - patch for avhv.t

2001-08-29 Thread Joe McMahon
I didn't send the one that uses Test::More, which was really silly because the one I sent doesn't work (left out one test)! This patch switches avhv.t to use Test::More; verified under 'make test' in ./bleadperl, and './perl -I../lib harness', and './perl -I../lib harness -v' in bleadperl/t. --

Re: Pod::Coverage random silliness

2001-08-29 Thread Richard Clamp
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 10:46:15AM +0100, Richard Clamp wrote: > Oddly Skud's script now segfaults under 5.6.1 while requiring the > second module it checks. (on my box this is Archive::Tar, after > Algorithm::MarkovChain) It didn't before so it's either something that > Pod::Find does or I subtly

Re: Pod::Coverage random silliness

2001-08-29 Thread Kirrily Robert
In perl.qa, you wrote: >On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 07:56:30PM -0400, Kirrily 'Skud' Robert wrote: >> This script... > >Nifty, mind if I assimilate it as an example script? Not at all. Credit as Kirrily "Skud" Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> please. K. -- Kirrily 'Skud' Robert - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - h

Re: ANNOUNCE Testing SDK

2001-08-29 Thread Tatsuhiko Miyagawa
What's wrong with Bundle::*? On Wed, 29 Aug 2001 02:54:41 -0400 Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This SDK bundles > > Test::Harness 1.23 > Test::Inline0.10 > Test::Simple0.16 > > into one easy to install tarball. It's been uploaded to CPAN. > Not quite sur

Re: ANNOUNCE Pod::Tests is now Test::Inline

2001-08-29 Thread Barrie Slaymaker
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 01:51:48AM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote: > > First, the syntax for the code examples has changed. Instead of > "=also begin/end example" it's "=for example begin/end". This doesn't > cause existing POD viewers to choke. So they just silently throw away all the example

Re: The hitlist of untested modules.

2001-08-29 Thread Jonathan Stowe
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Michael G Schwern wrote: > > Shell Ok this one is a little basic and it will need refining for the platforms I dont have access to - but it works where I can test it : --- MANIFEST~ Wed Aug 29 09:20:48 2001 +++ MANIFESTWed Aug 29 09:17:30 2001 @@ -1084,6 +1084,7 @@ li

Re: Pod::Coverage random silliness

2001-08-29 Thread Richard Clamp
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 08:57:45PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 07:56:30PM -0400, Kirrily 'Skud' Robert wrote: > > Term::ReadKey 0% > > This might be helped by doing: > > --- Coverage.orig Tue Aug 28 20:39:04 2001 > +++ lib/Pod/Coverage.pm

Re: Pod::Coverage random silliness

2001-08-29 Thread Richard Clamp
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 07:56:30PM -0400, Kirrily 'Skud' Robert wrote: > This script... Nifty, mind if I assimilate it as an example script? Sadly the hacking I did this morning makes it explode into bits, but that's definitely my bad. More on that in a second. -- Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: The hitlist of untested modules.

2001-08-29 Thread Arthur Bergman
01-08-29 10.25, skrev Jonathan Stowe på [EMAIL PROTECTED] följande: >> Shell > > Ok this one is a little basic and it will need refining for the platforms > I dont have access to - but it works where I can test it : > Applied, thanks! -- Arthur