Here's a test suite for Net::Config. In the process of writing this, I've
fixed an apparent bug that prevented single values from becoming array
references when necessary. I think it's right, but perhaps Graham should weigh
in on this.
In the process, with some advice from perl-qa, I've added
Here's a test suite for Net::Config. In the process of writing
this, I've fixed an apparent bug that prevented single values from
becoming array references when necessary. I think it's right, but
perhaps Graham should weigh in on this.
In the process, with some advice from perl-qa, I've
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 10:42:33PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 12:07:26AM -0600, chromatic wrote:
- Of those covered, a smidge less than half have 75% statement coverage. -
, 20% have 50% statement coverage.
Is it possible to get an update on
In article 20011021000950.I588@blackrider, Michael G Schwern
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For libnet it happens to work out that the untestable part (the network
connection) is incidental. The testable part (the protocol) is essential.
That's the sweet spot. If we can seperate the net
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jarkko Hietaniemi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In the process, with some advice from perl-qa, I've added a mock object so
the test could control the output of Socket::inet_ntoa() and
Socket::inet_aton(). t/lib/Mock/ seemed like as good a place as any.
I'm not
On Saturday 20 October 2001 11:54, you wrote:
So why is this tested using a mock-up by Net::Config? Sounds like
a job the Socket should be testing (and it is).
Oh, no! It's not. Mock::Socket is just a dummy object with the same
interface as Socket. It lets the test control the data sent
On 2001.10.20 17:16 Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 02:02:59AM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
I think installhtml teeters heavily on the brink of Rewriting
instead of Refactoring. It hasn't changed much since 1997.
Refactoring is just rewriting in small pieces.
Here's a test suite for Net::Config. In the process of writing this, I've
fixed an apparent bug that prevented single values from becoming array
references when necessary. I think it's right, but perhaps Graham should weigh
in on this.
In the process, with some advice from perl-qa, I've added
When looking at something that's going to prove nasty to test, you can
apply the same criteria as Holmes: Once we remove the untestable, what
remains, however difficult, must be testable.
What's the problem with testing libnet? The network connection. We
can't guarantee that the machine will
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 01:54:14AM -0600, chromatic wrote:
In article 20011020014825.J3681@blackrider, Michael G Schwern
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Convert from $opt_* globals to an %Options hash
A fun use of map!
Is there a test for this beast? A quick 'perl -wc installhtml'
Here's a test suite for Net::Config. In the process of writing
this, I've fixed an apparent bug that prevented single values from
becoming array references when necessary. I think it's right, but
perhaps Graham should weigh in on this.
In the process, with some advice from perl-qa, I've
In article 20011020014825.J3681@blackrider, Michael G Schwern
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Convert from $opt_* globals to an %Options hash
A fun use of map!
Is there a test for this beast? A quick 'perl -wc installhtml' verified that
it compiles, but refactoring's half complete without
12 matches
Mail list logo
