Re: Why not a smoke db ?

2002-09-23 Thread alian
> Do you get it from daily-build only? Yes even if I take some report on p5p because: 1/ daily-build is the best place to find report for daily-build no ? ;-) 2/ p5p have to more traffic 3/ this is easlier to add a parser that auto. fetch report on this newsgroup.

Re: Why not a smoke db ?

2002-09-23 Thread alian
> Oooh, they've got a Cray in theirs. See (1) > Part in English, part in French? :-) Oh yes, Compilateur => Compiler > I suppose that I should be thankful that it's not part Finnish, part Tamil. (1) Damm as you see, my english is not the best langage interface with me and I can't understand th

Re: Why not a smoke db ?

2002-09-23 Thread Robert Spier
Alain Barbet writes: >> Have you seen http://tinderbox.perl.org ? I've personally found that >> useful for monitoring Parrot, though it's not obvious how well it would >> scale for large numbers of smoke-test configurations. > >No I didn't know this, but find some good idea in this system too. >I

Re: Why not a smoke db ?

2002-09-23 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 05:50:45PM +0200, alian wrote: > After see a smoke report from Nicolas Clark using ccache, I took a look > at ccache web site. And find http://build.samba.org. Oooh, they've got a Cray in theirs. > So I've begin something like this, thing I would see on http://qa.perl.or

Re: Why not a smoke db ?

2002-09-23 Thread Abe Timmerman
Op een mooie herfstdag (Monday 23 September 2002 16:14), schreef Alain Barbet: > Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > http://www.alianwebserver.com/cgi-bin/smoke_db > > > Looks great! Some suggestions/questions: > > - freebsd os version missing? > > Yes it's missing info from Nicolas Clark reports. Tha

Re: Why not a smoke db ?

2002-09-23 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
> k, but this is a missing info from smoke report. The 'archname' from config.sh is definitely needed, then. -- Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ "There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. It is 'dead'." -- Jack Cohen

Re: Why not a smoke db ?

2002-09-23 Thread H.Merijn Brand
On Sat 21 Sep 2002 17:50, alian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After see a smoke report from Nicolas Clark using ccache, I took a look > at ccache web site. And find http://build.samba.org. > > So I've begin something like this, thing I would see on http://qa.perl.org: > http://www.alianwebserver.

Re: Why not a smoke db ?

2002-09-23 Thread Alain Barbet
Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: http://www.alianwebserver.com/cgi-bin/smoke_db > Looks great! Some suggestions/questions: > - freebsd os version missing? Yes it's missing info from Nicolas Clark reports. > - HP-UX has "gcc HPc" which > is a bit odd, what is the "HPc" > doing there? This a mi

Re: Web Site Testing

2002-09-23 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 23-Sep-02 Andy Lester carved into stone: >> 4) WWW::Automate and WWW::Chat > > I've forked WWW::Automate as WWW::Mechanize, to make it a bit more > robust, and to fix the bugs that have gone unfixed for at least six > months. > > Also, I don't see an

Re: Web Site Testing

2002-09-23 Thread Andy Lester
> 4) WWW::Automate and WWW::Chat I've forked WWW::Automate as WWW::Mechanize, to make it a bit more robust, and to fix the bugs that have gone unfixed for at least six months. Also, I don't see any mention of content handling. My HTML::Lint and its Test::HTML::Lint wrapper check the structure o

Re: Why not a smoke db ?

2002-09-23 Thread Alain Barbet
> Have you seen http://tinderbox.perl.org ? I've personally found that > useful for monitoring Parrot, though it's not obvious how well it would > scale for large numbers of smoke-test configurations. No I didn't know this, but find some good idea in this system too. I will see if it's possible

Re: Why not a smoke db ?

2002-09-23 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, Alian wrote: > After see a smoke report from Nicolas Clark using ccache, I took a look > at ccache web site. And find http://build.samba.org. > > So I've begin something like this, thing I would see on http://qa.perl.org: > http://www.alianwebserver.com/cgi-bin/smoke_db Ha

Re: Why not a perl-current smoke test database ?

2002-09-23 Thread Rafael Garcia-Suarez
alian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * searchable for the past (and for keywords in failures or fulltext, like > > "bigint" > > Yep I will add this shortly. > > > * spares me the "smoke foo" messages, that contain all Ok and fool me into > > thinking there was some smoke > > Sorry my so poor en

Re: Why not a perl-current smoke test database ?

2002-09-23 Thread alian
> * searchable for the past (and for keywords in failures or fulltext, like > "bigint" Yep I will add this shortly. > * spares me the "smoke foo" messages, that contain all Ok and fool me into > thinking there was some smoke Sorry my so poor english doesn't understand that. Coud you explain mor

Re: Web Site Testing

2002-09-23 Thread Mark Fowler
On 23 Sep 2002, Dave Cross wrote: > A way to throw requests at various parts of the web site in order > to test the a) correctness and b) speed of the responses. For pure speed testing we use normally use http_load[1], as it allows us to simulate many people with a 28.8Kb modem, which is totall

Re: Web Site Testing

2002-09-23 Thread Leon Brocard
Ilya Martynov sent the following bits through the ether: > 4) WWW::Automate and WWW::Chat And recently petdance has updated WWW::Automate to WWW::Mechanize. Personally I use a home-brewed solution which is very compact test-wise, but I'm open to moving to something where other people can underst

Re: Why not a perl-current smoke test database ?

2002-09-23 Thread Allen Smith
On Sep 22, 8:34am, alian wrote: > (I re-send this, I didn't find it on list) > > After see a smoke report from Nicolas Clark using ccache, I took a look > at ccache web site. And find http://build.samba.org. > > So I've begin something like this, thing I would see on http://qa.perl.org: > http

Re: Web Site Testing

2002-09-23 Thread Ilya Martynov
> On 23 Sep 2002 02:42:14 -0700, "Dave Cross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: DC> What is the current state of the art in testing web apps. DC> What we have: DC> * mod_perl (Apache::Registry) web site DC> * cookies (boo!) DC> * frames (bigger boo!!) DC> What we need: DC> A way to throw requests

Web Site Testing

2002-09-23 Thread Dave Cross
What is the current state of the art in testing web apps. What we have: * mod_perl (Apache::Registry) web site * cookies (boo!) * frames (bigger boo!!) What we need: A way to throw requests at various parts of the web site in order to test the a) correctness and b) speed of the responses. Is

Why not a smoke db ?

2002-09-23 Thread alian
After see a smoke report from Nicolas Clark using ccache, I took a look at ccache web site. And find http://build.samba.org. So I've begin something like this, thing I would see on http://qa.perl.org: http://www.alianwebserver.com/cgi-bin/smoke_db Comments are welcome. -- Alain BARBET