I'm working on Test::Builder 0.48 and here's some relatively major changes
I'm putting in. Some advance warning and a chance for folks to convince me
otherwise.
* Test::Harness will no longer be optional.
Currently, the tests do not require a Test::Harness upgrade. They simply
skip over anyth
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 14:46:38 -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> OTOH, my thinking recently is that the explicit plan has become obsolescent.
> [1]
>
> The explicit plan protects against:
>
> 1. Your test dying.
> 2. Your test not printing tests to STDOUT
> 3. Exiting early via exit().
>
> #1 an
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 05:46:38PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> OTOH, my thinking recently is that the explicit plan has become obsolescent.
> [1]
> [1] This thinking makes me nervous, so I'm open to someone convincing me
> otherwise.
My take on this is that tests should failsafe. I don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On 14-Oct-02 Michael G Schwern carved into stone:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 04:01:10PM -0700, David Wheeler wrote:
> The explicit plan protects against:
>
> 1. Your test dying.
> 2. Your test not printing tests to STDOUT
> 3. Exiting early via exit().
4
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 04:01:10PM -0700, David Wheeler wrote:
> On Sunday, October 13, 2002, at 10:05 AM, Tony Bowden wrote:
> >> Makes it simpler for people who prefer the 'no_plan' style of
> >> testing
> >
> >Maybe this is what I just don't get. I'm not one of those people, so I
> >
