You beat me to it, but I think PERL_SMOKE would be better.
The automated tools that need to run the long tests instead of the short
tests are the "smokers".
Except that "smoke" has the context of the perl distro tests that are
getting done. If anybody's gonna be using the "smoke" concept, it'll
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 10:55:29AM +0100, Mark Fowler wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, [iso-8859-1] Andrew Savige wrote:
>
> > While a standard name is not required, having one would allow
> > automated CPAN test harnesses to run the longer tests.
>
> While we're on it, it'd be nice to have a standar
> "Andrew" == Andrew savige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andrew> Since no experienced perl-qa'er has leapt in, and against my better
Andrew> judgement, I suggest an environment variable name of:
Andrew> PERL_TEST_LONG
You beat me to it, but I think PERL_SMOKE would be better.
The automated to
