Re: Devel::Cover and nested subroutines

2004-06-28 Thread Geoffrey Young
> Thanks a lot for the test cases. I think there are two separate bugs > here, but I'm only going to take responsibility for one ;-) :) > > First, mine. The problem with Foo.pm (the minimal test case) is that > completely empty subroutines (that is subs which contain no statements > at all) a

Re: C/C++ White-Box Unit Testing and Test::More

2004-06-28 Thread Adrian Howard
On 26 Jun 2004, at 12:51, Fergal Daly wrote: On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 10:13:52PM +0100, Adrian Howard wrote: [snip] What xUnit gives you is a little bit more infrastructure to make these sorts of task easier. That's fair enough but that infrastructure is just extra baggage in some cases. True. The