On Oct 2, 2004, at 2:30 PM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
I started to maintain Apache-Test skeletons, but I never quite got
them up
to speed. give me a few days and I'll roll a tarball with a test-cover
target so that folks can have an entire working example of the way I
would
do it.
Perhaps I should a
On Oct 2, 2004, at 12:36 PM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
we use Apache-Test, which starts the server, runs the tests, and shuts
down
the server again.
When I last talked with you about Apache-Test, I seem to recall that
you said that it was restricted to running the tests serially. Is this
still tr
> [ Just before sending this I notice Geoff has recommended something
> better, but I'll send this too as another WTDI. ]
cool :)
I started to maintain Apache-Test skeletons, but I never quite got them up
to speed. give me a few days and I'll roll a tarball with a test-cover
target so that folk
Kevin Scaldeferri wrote:
>
> On Oct 2, 2004, at 12:36 PM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
>>>
>>
>> we use Apache-Test, which starts the server, runs the tests, and shuts
>> down
>> the server again.
>
>
>
> When I last talked with you about Apache-Test, I seem to recall that you
> said that it was
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 11:20:05AM -0700, Kevin Scaldeferri wrote:
> On Sep 21, 2004, at 1:30 PM, Kevin Scaldeferri wrote:
> >
> >So, I don't expect anyone to try to figure out this stack trace stuff,
> >but I'm curious if other people have seen stability problems like
> >this? Alternatively, i
> if you haven't investigated Apache-Test yet, I would. our custom make
> target look like this:
I forgot to add some A-T specific stuff :)
t/conf/modperl_extra.pl:
if ($ENV{HARNESS_PERL_SWITCHES}) {
eval {
require Devel::Cover;
Devel::Cover->import('+ignore' => 't/response/'
Kevin Scaldeferri wrote:
>
> On Sep 21, 2004, at 1:30 PM, Kevin Scaldeferri wrote:
>
>>
>> So, I don't expect anyone to try to figure out this stack trace stuff,
>> but I'm curious if other people have seen stability problems like
>> this? Alternatively, if someone can tell me the exact logist
On Sep 21, 2004, at 1:30 PM, Kevin Scaldeferri wrote:
So, I don't expect anyone to try to figure out this stack trace stuff,
but I'm curious if other people have seen stability problems like
this? Alternatively, if someone can tell me the exact logistics of
how they get the coverage out in the
--- Gabor Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On this page
> http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Downloads/ActivePerl/PPM/Repository
> there are two links to the build status of various CPAN modules
> using 5.6 and 5.8 respoectively.
[snip]
> The individual build results have their own separate files s
I wonder if there was already a way to get the collected data similarry
to the one you can get from http://testers.cpan.org/
I suspect they'd be willing to share. I talked to some of the guys
from ActiveState out at OSCON and discussed the status issues. Most
notably, I want to know if one of
On this page
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Downloads/ActivePerl/PPM/Repository
there are two links to the build status of various CPAN modules
using 5.6 and 5.8 respoectively.
http://ppm.ActiveState.com/BuildStatus/5.6.html
http://ppm.ActiveState.com/BuildStatus/5.8.html
Warning: They are big,
11 matches
Mail list logo
