Re: [ANNOUNCE] Test::Simple/More/Builder 0.54 (problem with signa ture?)

2004-12-16 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 12:59:00PM -, Orton, Yves wrote: > Ah, sorry. I didnt understand. Im just curious if i alter this file this > will affect all "make dist" commands? Only if that module doesn't have its own MANIFEST.SKIP. > Is there any chance the default could have ".bak" added in fu

Re: New qa.perl.org updates

2004-12-16 Thread Ovid
--- Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Patches, please. s/html$/pod/ in the URL for the source. Sorry. I should have gotten these out sooner. I was sidetracked. I've attached patches to add Test::MockModule to the module list and to add the "use_ok() or die" wording to the testing gui

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Test::Simple/More/Builder 0.54 (problem with signa ture?)

2004-12-16 Thread Orton, Yves
> Not Test::More's MANIFEST.SKIP. The system's default MANIFEST.SKIP. > ExtUtils::MANIFEST.SKIP. > > Run "perldoc -m ExtUtils::MANIFEST.SKIP" and see if it looks like either of > the urls above. Ah, sorry. I didnt understand. Im just curious if i alter this file this will affect all "make dist"

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Test::Simple/More/Builder 0.54 (problem with signa ture?)

2004-12-16 Thread Orton, Yves
> Perhaps you've got a damaged default MANIFEST.SKIP. Check what > "perldoc -m ExtUtils::MANIFEST.SKIP" looks like. It should > look like this. > > http://search.cpan.org/src/MSCHWERN/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.24/lib/ExtUtils/MAN IFEST.SKIP > > Not like this. > http://search.cpan.org/src/MSCHWERN/E

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Test::Simple/More/Builder 0.54 (problem with signa ture?)

2004-12-16 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 12:03:52PM -, Orton, Yves wrote: > > Perhaps you've got a damaged default MANIFEST.SKIP. Check what > > "perldoc -m ExtUtils::MANIFEST.SKIP" looks like. It should > > look like this. > > > http://search.cpan.org/src/MSCHWERN/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.24/lib/ExtUtils/MAN >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Test::Simple/More/Builder 0.54 (problem with signa ture?)

2004-12-16 Thread Ed Allen Smith
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (on 16 December 2004 16:45:01 +1100), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Savige) wrote: >Steve Hay wrote: >> is even worse: 1 second again on 5.8.6/perl-malloc versus 56 >> seconds on 5.8.4/system-malloc! > >I'm pretty sure realloc() is the culprit here. >A common trick used b