On Monday, June 27, Marc Prewitt and I will be making a presentation at
YAPC::NA::2005 in Toronto entitled "Phalanx from the Trenches: A Local
Perl Users Group's Experience."
While the main focus of our talk will be on our experience with the Perl
Seminar NY Phalanx contingent's work on Text-
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 06:57:24PM +0200, David Landgren wrote:
> >My understanding is that inclusion on the Phalanx 100 doesn't constitute
> >any sort of endorsement of the modules. It's hopefully a statement that
> >the module is widely used, but not a judgment on whether it ought to be.
>
>
On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 22:57 +0100, Adrian Howard wrote:
> Getting some test failures on vanilla OS X 10.4.1 (see below). Not
> got time to dig into causes at the moment.
I've bumped up the Test-Simple version requirement in Build.PL to fix
this.
> Looks nice though. Like the roles stuff.
Than
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 06:48:30AM -0400, Dave Paris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> It was brought to my attention that Crypt::DES is included in the
> Phalanx 100 list. While I'm flattered, I think this should be replaced
> by a better symmetrical crypto module like Crypt::Rijndael.
Don't be fla
Kevin Scaldeferri wrote:
My understanding is that inclusion on the Phalanx 100 doesn't constitute
any sort of endorsement of the modules. It's hopefully a statement that
the module is widely used, but not a judgment on whether it ought to be.
They are not endorsed, but they are considered "im
On Jun 2, 2005, at 3:48 AM, Dave Paris wrote:
Greetings,
It was brought to my attention that Crypt::DES is included in the
Phalanx 100 list. While I'm flattered, I think this should be
replaced by a better symmetrical crypto module like Crypt::Rijndael.
The reasoning is simple. Crypt::DE
Greetings,
It was brought to my attention that Crypt::DES is included in the
Phalanx 100 list. While I'm flattered, I think this should be replaced
by a better symmetrical crypto module like Crypt::Rijndael.
The reasoning is simple. Crypt::DES is terribly weak and slow by
comparison. The
On 2 Jun 2005, at 10:01, Michael G Schwern wrote:
[snip]
Test::More 0.48_02 introduced a change where it would put a leading
newline before its diagnostics when running under Test::Harness.
Looks
like the test expected that. You're probably running Test::More 0.47.
[snip]
Bah. I knew that
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 10:57:21PM +0100, Adrian Howard wrote:
> ok 15 - ... having cleared out any existing failures
> # Failed test (t/base.t at line 95)
> # Structures begin differing at:
> # $got->{failures}[0]{diagnostics} = 'Failed test
> (fake_tests/fail.t at line 9)
>
Folks,
Can anyone recommend any texts on testing applications and libraries that are
supposed to work with threads? How to force race conditions, that sort of
thing?
N
On 30 May 2005, at 22:23, chromatic wrote:
[snip]
I'd love to have feedback before I release it to the CPAN in a week or
so.
[snip]
Getting some test failures on vanilla OS X 10.4.1 (see below). Not
got time to dig into causes at the moment.
Looks nice though. Like the roles stuff.
Adrian
11 matches
Mail list logo