Tels wrote:
Moin,
On Friday 10 March 2006 12:26, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Hi all!
We had a discussion here about the pros and cons of using
Module::Install with "use inc::Module::Install" in the Makefile.PL, and
bundling it along. Well, now a showstopping bug happened in
Module::Install and several
Yuval Kogman wrote:
> The problem with these is that Module::Signature fails when it
> should warn if the key is not present in the user's keyring.
>
> If this technical issue is solved then regardless of whether or not
> signature tests are useless (i think they are, but then again i also
> think
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 13:36:26 +0100, Tels wrote:
> So the bug might not affect everyone - but it is bad and makes me
> re-consider using Module::Install only when necessary.
Module::Install makes sense for applications and deployment and all
that For regular CPAN modules I think it's overk
Moin,
On Friday 10 March 2006 12:26, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> We had a discussion here about the pros and cons of using
> Module::Install with "use inc::Module::Install" in the Makefile.PL, and
> bundling it along. Well, now a showstopping bug happened in
> Module::Install and several modu
Hi all!
We had a discussion here about the pros and cons of using Module::Install with
"use inc::Module::Install" in the Makefile.PL, and bundling it along. Well,
now a showstopping bug happened in Module::Install and several modules that
included the affected version suffered:
http://search.c
