Re: TAPx::Parser 0.05_03

2007-01-09 Thread Adam Kennedy
As an aside, installs OK for me on Win32k... So far you're the only Windows person to tell me that. What version of Windows/Perl/TAPx::Parser are we talking about? Ook, sorry, looks like I only installed 0.41. BTW, why have you dropped the version number from so high to so low. Adam K

Re: TAPx::Parser 0.05_03

2007-01-09 Thread Adam Kennedy
Ovid wrote: --- Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: One of the principles of PITA is that we do as little as possible inside the operating system image. That includes NOT calculating a judgement call for "PASS" or "FAIL" or at least ignoring it if it gets done. From reading the PITA docs

Re: TAPx::Parser 0.05_03

2007-01-09 Thread Ovid
--- Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> As an aside, installs OK for me on Win32k... > > > > So far you're the only Windows person to tell me that. What > version of > > Windows/Perl/TAPx::Parser are we talking about? > > Ook, sorry, looks like I only installed 0.41. > > BTW, why have

Re: TAPx::Parser 0.05_03

2007-01-09 Thread Ovid
--- Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My main problem is that I can't write anything of my own. > > The test sequence tries to stay as close to the default as possible. > > Which means all I can do is: > > perl Makefile.PL > make > make test > make install > > So rather than writing my

Using pip to get testing done better and faster...

2007-01-09 Thread Adam Kennedy
If anyone has been paying attention to my journal, you may have vaguely heard about "pip" (which I named mostly because it's cute, easy to type and not taken by anything other program in debian, but which we can also call the "Perl Installer Program" if people like). One feature I just added i

Re: Using pip to get testing done better and faster...

2007-01-09 Thread Paul Johnson
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 10:05:05PM +1100, Adam Kennedy wrote: > If anyone has been paying attention to my journal, you may have vaguely > heard about "pip" (which I named mostly because it's cute, easy to type > and not taken by anything other program in debian, but which we can also > call the

Re: Using pip to get testing done better and faster...

2007-01-09 Thread Paul Johnson
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 11:07:35PM +1100, Adam Kennedy wrote: > Crap, there's a pip program on CPM? > > What does it do? It is the Peripheral Interchange Program. The Unix equivalent would be cp, I suppose. > I did google around a bit, and I thought I'd gotten everything. > > And what is CPM?

Re: Using pip to get testing done better and faster...

2007-01-09 Thread Steve Peters
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 02:05:49PM +0100, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 11:07:35PM +1100, Adam Kennedy wrote: > > > Crap, there's a pip program on CPM? > > > > What does it do? > > It is the Peripheral Interchange Program. The Unix equivalent would be > cp, I suppose. > > > I d

Re: Using pip to get testing done better and faster...

2007-01-09 Thread David Cantrell
Steve Peters wrote: And what is CPM? :) Think pre-Commodore 64 Commodore. Actually, you could get CP/M for the Commodore 64, but I don't know of anyone who ever did. Nothing to do with Commodore, it was written by Digital Research (which was eventually swallowed up by Novell). It's now free

IPC::Open3 failure on Windows

2007-01-09 Thread Ovid
The last major obstacle (that I know of) to get TAPx::Parser into beta is the IPC::Open3 issue on Windows. I've described it fairly carefully at: http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=593769 Any and all help would be very, very much appreciated. I'm absolutely stuck (ok, $stuck eq $beggin

Re: Using pip to get testing done better and faster...

2007-01-09 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 02:30:56PM +, David Cantrell wrote: > Sadly, I doubt it's really possible. Perl makes far too many Unixy > assumptions. What are these "directories" of which you speak? :-) although I doubt that that one is really the clincher, as Perl has been ported to some somewh

Re: IPC::Open3 failure on Windows

2007-01-09 Thread Steve Peters
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 11:17:58AM -0800, Ovid wrote: > The last major obstacle (that I know of) to get TAPx::Parser into beta > is the IPC::Open3 issue on Windows. I've described it fairly carefully > at: > > http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=593769 > > Any and all help would be very,

Re: Using pip to get testing done better and faster...

2007-01-09 Thread Steve Peters
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 02:30:56PM +, David Cantrell wrote: > Steve Peters wrote: > >>>And what is CPM? :) > >Think pre-Commodore 64 Commodore. Actually, you could get CP/M for the > >Commodore 64, but I don't know of anyone who ever did. > > Nothing to do with Commodore, it was written by Di

Re: Using pip to get testing done better and faster...

2007-01-09 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Jan 9, 2007, at 3:05 AM, Adam Kennedy wrote: Just some tips I thought I'd pimp... ewr... I mean pass on. Obviously, you should call it `pimp` rather than `pip`. Probably isn't used by any other program in the universe, either. ;-) —David

Re: Using pip to get testing done better and faster...

2007-01-09 Thread Joshua ben Jore
On 1/9/07, David E. Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jan 9, 2007, at 3:05 AM, Adam Kennedy wrote: > Just some tips I thought I'd pimp... ewr... I mean pass on. Obviously, you should call it `pimp` rather than `pip`. Probably isn't used by any other program in the universe, either. ;-) I