I'd like to have a discussion about rethinking the "How do I do what I
want to do?" problem that people have been discussing, and that I
talked about here: http://perlbuzz.com/2008/04/rethinking-the-interface-to-cpan.html
I've started a separate group, away from here, to discuss.
http://grou
On Saturday 05 April 2008, Andy Lester wrote:
> On Apr 5, 2008, at 1:34 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > Thanks for the comments. See below for my response. It will be a
> > rather
> > stream-of-consciousness thing, but I hope something can come up of it.
>
> I've expanded my original comments here:
> ht
On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 13:42 -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
> On Apr 5, 2008, at 1:34 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > Thanks for the comments. See below for my response. It will be a
> > rather
> > stream-of-consciousness thing, but I hope something can come up of
> it.
>
>
> I've expanded my original com
On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 21:34 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Anyway, I'll probably set up a wiki page about it, so we can
> brain-storm more easily.
I will contribute when it's available then.
--
--gh
On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 15:16 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Why do you feel my previous email was not concise or definite? I admit
coulda woulda shoulda ...
> it was
> a sort-of brainstorming email, but it was not too long. If you want a
this reply is even longer ;-)
> one
> paragraph summary t
On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 16:54 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> On Saturday 05 April 2008, Guy Hulbert wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 15:16 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > > one
> > > paragraph summary then:
> > >
> > >
> > > I suggest having a feed of human readable (and possibly machine
> >
On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 12:21 -0500, Jonathan Rockway wrote:
> > So what do you think - is there an interest in this?
>
> I think you should just do it. Then we can see if there is interest or
> not.
I will be doing the part I volunteered for ... sooner or later even if
it's just for my own use.
On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 14:02 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> In regards to the previous discussion about trimming down CPAN and finding
I don't think trimming is necessary if you are successful with this.
IMO the problem is just finding things, which your proposal addresses.
> better way
On Apr 5, 2008, at 1:34 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Thanks for the comments. See below for my response. It will be a
rather
stream-of-consciousness thing, but I hope something can come up of it.
I've expanded my original comments here:
http://perlbuzz.com/2008/04/rethinking-the-interface-to-cpan
Hi Andy! (and all)
Thanks for the comments. See below for my response. It will be a rather
stream-of-consciousness thing, but I hope something can come up of it.
On Saturday 05 April 2008, Andy Lester wrote:
> Every so often, an idea's like Shlomi's comes up, where we talk about
> adding reviews
* On Sat, Apr 05 2008, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> In regards to the previous discussion about trimming down CPAN and finding
> better ways to find quality modules, I got an idea of making CPAN "category"
> reviews. The idea was originally derived from Freshmeat.net where they often
> have
Every so often, an idea's like Shlomi's comes up, where we talk about
adding reviews to CPAN, or reorganizing the categories, or any number
of relatively easy-to-implement tasks. It's a good idea, but it's
focused too tightly. What we're really trying to do is not provide
reviews, but hel
On Apr 5, 2008, at 6:02 AM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Hi all!
In regards to the previous discussion about trimming down CPAN and
finding
better ways to find quality modules, I got an idea of making CPAN
"category"
reviews. The idea was originally derived from Freshmeat.net where
they often
have
On Saturday 05 April 2008, Guy Hulbert wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 15:16 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > one
> > paragraph summary then:
> >
> >
> > I suggest having a feed of human readable (and possibly machine
> > readable)
> > reviews of the modules in various CPAN categories, as
Hi!
Thanks for your email.
On Saturday 05 April 2008, Guy Hulbert wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 14:02 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > In regards to the previous discussion about trimming down CPAN and
> > finding
>
> I don't think trimming is necessary if you are successful with th
Hi all!
In regards to the previous discussion about trimming down CPAN and finding
better ways to find quality modules, I got an idea of making CPAN "category"
reviews. The idea was originally derived from Freshmeat.net where they often
have category reviews of the various software hosted there
16 matches
Mail list logo
