On Jul 26, 2008, at 20:32, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
That has been my reaction.
SQLite has far more features. Compared to a full RDBMS, SQLite is
an RDBM without the S – Drizzle is more of a… DMS. Essentially it
goes back to MySQL’s flatfile-with-quasi-SQL-frontend roots.
Whether they take of
* David E. Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-27 05:20]:
> On Jul 25, 2008, at 19:52, Andy Lester wrote:
>> I know, but that "OMG THAT'S JUST SQLITE" is the #1 comment
>> I've been seeing.
>
> That has been my reaction.
SQLite has far more features. Compared to a full RDBMS, SQLite is
an RDBM wi
On Saturday 26 July 2008 20:18:13 David E. Wheeler wrote:
> That has been my reaction. I do assume, though, that aside from
> Jonathan Rockaway's comments that seem to justify the suspicion that
> it's just MySQLite, that the major difference will be that Drizzle
> (terrible name, BTW) will be a c
On Jul 25, 2008, at 19:52, Andy Lester wrote:
It's more than that.
I know, but that "OMG THAT'S JUST SQLITE" is the #1 comment I've
been seeing.
That has been my reaction. I do assume, though, that aside from
Jonathan Rockaway's comments that seem to justify the suspicion that
it's jus
* On Fri, Jul 25 2008, Andy Lester wrote:
> Drizzle is the new fork of MySQL that removes many many features to
> save weight, but is still able to handle concurrent users unlike
> SQLite.
SQLite handles concurrent users. Some people dislike the fact that row
writes lock the entire table, though.
On 26 Jul 2008, at 03:36, Andy Lester wrote:
Drizzle is the new fork of MySQL that removes many many features to
save weight, but is still able to handle concurrent users unlike
SQLite.
http://developers.slashdot.org/developers/08/07/23/1234203.shtml
The current MySQL testing system is done
