Eric Wilhelm wrote:
My stock thinking is that because it follows the xUnit pattern that's
most familiar to most non-Perl programmers. It's the first thing
they stumble on that looks like what they're used to. So that's what
they go with.
Even if they had no prior language experience, if
On Sep 17, 2008, at 13:24, Michael G Schwern wrote:
FWIW I added a TAP column to the Perl section on Wikipedia's list of
unit
testing frameworks. If every testing framework has to sound off on
xUnit, why
not TAP?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unit_testing_frameworks#Perl
I think
David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Sep 17, 2008, at 13:24, Michael G Schwern wrote:
FWIW I added a TAP column to the Perl section on Wikipedia's list of unit
testing frameworks. If every testing framework has to sound off on
xUnit, why
not TAP?
# from Michael G Schwern
# on Wednesday 17 September 2008 17:51:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unit_testing_frameworks#Perl
I think that you can add TAP columns for JavaScript and PHP, too,
no?
Yeah, and so can you. :P
This mail contains unsubstantiated or potentially subjective
