Tested File-Find-Object-0.1.1 with Class::Accessor not installed

2008-10-23 Thread Shlomi Fish
Hi Chris! These reports: * http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2008/10/msg2472650.html * http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2008/10/msg2473253.html Have tested File-Find-Object without installing its Class::Accessor pre-requisite: # at t/01ffo.t line 9. #

Re: Tested File-Find-Object-0.1.1 with Class::Accessor not installed

2008-10-23 Thread Ovid
--- On Thu, 23/10/08, Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have tested File-Find-Object without installing its Class::Accessor pre-requisite: Here is a list of prerequisites you specified and versions we managed to load: Module Name

Re: Public Humiliation and Kwalitee (was Re: Tested File-Find-Object-0.1.1 with Class::Accessor not installed)

2008-10-23 Thread Andy Lester
On Oct 23, 2008, at 12:37 PM, chromatic wrote: I don't care about backchannel communication between other authors and CPAN Testers, but how can you blame Shlomi for thinking that public humiliation isn't a vital component of Kwalitee? There's prior art:

Re: Public Humiliation and Kwalitee (was Re: Tested File-Find-Object-0.1.1 with Class::Accessor not installed)

2008-10-23 Thread Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
On Thu, October 23, 2008 10:37 am, chromatic wrote: I don't care about backchannel communication between other authors and CPAN Testers, but how can you blame Shlomi for thinking that public humiliation isn't a vital component of Kwalitee? There's prior art:

Public Humiliation and Kwalitee (was Re: Tested File-Find-Object-0.1.1 with Class::Accessor not installed)

2008-10-23 Thread chromatic
On Thursday 23 October 2008 06:34:41 Ovid wrote: That being said, why are you trying to publicly humiliate people by sending this information to Perl-QA? I've contacted Perl-QA to try and find a smoke author before, but not to name and shame. That just seems rude. I don't care about

Re: Public Humiliation and Kwalitee (was Re: Tested File-Find-Object-0.1.1 with Class::Accessor not installed)

2008-10-23 Thread Andy Lester
On Oct 23, 2008, at 1:25 PM, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: http://cpants.perl.org/highscores/hall_of_shame That looks sorted by kwalitee and author. If we're shaming people, author name shouldn't be a factor. Could it be by kwalitee and most recent release date instead? How about

Re: Public Humiliation and Kwalitee (was Re: Tested File-Find-Object-0.1.1 with Class::Accessor not installed)

2008-10-23 Thread chromatic
On Thursday 23 October 2008 11:25:05 Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: On Thu, October 23, 2008 10:37 am, chromatic wrote: I don't care about backchannel communication between other authors and CPAN Testers, but how can you blame Shlomi for thinking that public humiliation isn't a vital

Re: Public Humiliation and Kwalitee (was Re: Tested File-Find-Object-0.1.1 with Class::Accessor not installed)

2008-10-23 Thread Gabor Szabo
http://cpants.perl.org/highscores/hall_of_shame It says Not Found thanks domm Gabor

Apology. Re: Public Humiliation and Kwalitee

2008-10-23 Thread Ovid
Shlomi, Given what was said here and my own past statements on wanting to improve civility, I apologize to you (and publicly!) because regardless of my opinion of your email, I should not have copied the Perl-QA list on that. It was very disrespectful of me. Sincerely, Ovid -- Buy the book

[ANNOUNCE] Test::More/Simple/Builder 0.85_01 (cmp_ok() fixage warning)

2008-10-23 Thread Michael G Schwern
http://test-more.googlecode.com/files/Test-Simple-0.85_01.tar.gz This latest release resolves a number of long outstanding issues in cmp_ok(). The biggest being this: cmp_ok $object, '==', $number; cmp_ok() would always stringify or numify its arguments, removing the overloading. This