- Original Message
From: Eric Wilhelm scratchcomput...@gmail.com
For example, if a test program knows that it is going to
exit abnormally, even after it has finished emitting TAP according to
its plan, it should emit one final not ok line before exiting.
So,
1. TAP::Harness
Eric Wilhelm wrote:
1. TAP::Harness should store that when archiving?
It would be nice if TAP::Harness::Archive noted the exit code in the meta.yml file included in the
archive.
--
Michael Peters
Plus Three, LP
I'm strugling to find a common denominator in these test results:
http://bbbike.radzeit.de/~slaven/cpantestersmatrix.cgi?dist=Devel-NYTProf+2.07_94
It would be wonderful if there was some tool that would analyse the
perl -V output and help identify the combinations of settings associated
with
Hey,
On Jan 28, 2009, at 5:19 PM, Ovid wrote:
That being said, 'not ok - test exited prematurely' is not terribly
structured and doesn't necessarily let an advanced TAP consumer
present this information any better.
As I understand it, the idea behind the final 'not ok' isn't as an
Tim Bunce wrote:
I'm strugling to find a common denominator in these test results:
http://bbbike.radzeit.de/~slaven/cpantestersmatrix.cgi?dist=Devel-NYTProf+2.07_94
It would be wonderful if there was some tool that would analyse the
perl -V output and help identify the combinations of settings
- Original Message
From: Gaurav Vaidya gau...@ggvaidya.com
As I understand it, the idea behind the final 'not ok' isn't as an
additionally
failed test, but as a way of forcing the plan to fail. That'll work as long
as
you don't have 'N' tests, and exactly 'N-1' tests finish
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 01:50:05PM +, Tim Bunce wrote:
I'm strugling to find a common denominator in these test results:
http://bbbike.radzeit.de/~slaven/cpantestersmatrix.cgi?dist=Devel-NYTProf+2.07_94
Try http://www.cpantesters.org/show/Devel-NYTProf.html (requires
Javascript), then in
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 03:56:28PM +, Martin Evans wrote:
Tim Bunce wrote:
I'm strugling to find a common denominator in these test results:
http://bbbike.radzeit.de/~slaven/cpantestersmatrix.cgi?dist=Devel-NYTProf+2.07_94
Not intel 64 bit int and multi-threaded perl then? Looked common
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Tim Bunce tim.bu...@pobox.com wrote:
I'm strugling to find a common denominator in these test results:
