Andy Armstrong wrote:
How about being able to nominate a directory to receive the TAP?
That sounds reasonable. But should anything be done for a plain file?
--
Michael Peters
Plus Three, LP
On 10 Mar 2009, at 23:44, Michael Peters wrote:
However, it doesn't seem to DWIM.
$ prove -a test.out -l t/Builder/ok_obj.t
Archive is not a known format type! at
/usr/local/perl/5.10.0/lib/5.10.0/App/Prove.pm line 485
Seems it only supports tarballs.
That's because it generates multiple files.
Michael G Schwern wrote:
However, it doesn't seem to DWIM.
$ prove -a test.out -l t/Builder/ok_obj.t
Archive is not a known format type! at
/usr/local/perl/5.10.0/lib/5.10.0/App/Prove.pm line 485
Seems it only supports tarballs.
That's because it generates multiple files. 1 per TAP stream an
Steffen Schwigon wrote:
> Somewhat related to Andy Lesters problem some days ago about the TAP
> of "prove --verbose" should not be touched.
>
> Is it possible to make the output "idempotent", i.e., that I can take
> the output of "prove --verbose" and parse it again with same results?
>
> In par
Hi!
Somewhat related to Andy Lesters problem some days ago about the TAP
of "prove --verbose" should not be touched.
Is it possible to make the output "idempotent", i.e., that I can take
the output of "prove --verbose" and parse it again with same results?
In particular the finally added "ok" li
