Dave Mitchell wrote:
> So unless some other problem comes up, then 0.91 should match both those
> goals and everyone's happy.
0.92 is on its way to CPAN with Craig's fixes.
http://github.com/schwern/test-more/tree/v0.92
--
A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow o
Dave Mitchell wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 07:23:31PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>> Craig A. Berry wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
This is a quick release to sync with perl so 5.10.1 can release with a
stable
version number. It does NOT
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 07:23:31PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Craig A. Berry wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> >> This is a quick release to sync with perl so 5.10.1 can release with a
> >> stable
> >> version number. It does NOT include the subtest() co
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> This is a quick release to sync with perl so 5.10.1 can release with a stable
> version number. It does NOT include the subtest() code in 0.89_01 (don't
> worry, it'll be back).
The attached patch does two things:
1.) Copy and paste the
- Original Message
> From: Michael G Schwern
>
> > The latest developer release of Test::More allows subtests. Subtests are
> > great
> > in that they solve a lot of problems in advanced Perl testing, but they have
> > required a change in Test::Builder.
>
> Whoa whoa whoa! While its
