Erik Osheim wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 01:42:23PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>> At best you have the ability to group statements together into a test, but I
>> already have that without any intervening pseudo-block to get in the way of
>> debugging.
>
> Do you not have problems with tes
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 01:42:23PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> At best you have the ability to group statements together into a test, but I
> already have that without any intervening pseudo-block to get in the way of
> debugging.
Do you not have problems with tests dying? I may be dealing w
Adrian Howard wrote:
> 2) Much of the value from Perl's test frameworks come from the stupid
> number of useful testing modules that work happily with each other. I
> can just pick Test::WWW::Mechanise (or whatever) off the shelf and use
> it with the rest of the testing framework.
>
> It's going
Mark Morgan wrote:
> [1] Test::Class is my preferred testing package for work; I don't use
> it for stuff destined for CPAN due to adding an extra dependancy.
> *sigh*
Your CPAN modules already depend on things like Moose and Hook::LexWrap and
XML::Parser. Leaving out Test::Class at that point is
Erik Osheim writes:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 10:10:19AM +0200, Steffen Schwigon wrote:
>> Maybe it's not the latest version you attached, I think it's only the
>> skeleton from module::starter.
>
> Well, I suppose it's better that I sent the wrong tarball here, rather
> than uploading it to CPAN,
On 7 Jul 2009, at 15:47, Erik Osheim wrote:
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 10:10:19AM +0200, Steffen Schwigon wrote:
Maybe it's not the latest version you attached, I think it's only the
skeleton from module::starter.
Well, I suppose it's better that I sent the wrong tarball here, rather
than uploa
On Jul 7, 2009, at 7:47 AM, Erik Osheim wrote:
Well, I suppose it's better that I sent the wrong tarball here, rather
than uploading it to CPAN, but it's still embarrassing.
Anyway, I created a new tarball (using ./Build dist; thanks for that
tip) and am attaching it.
Looks interesting. I'm n
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 10:10:19AM +0200, Steffen Schwigon wrote:
> Maybe it's not the latest version you attached, I think it's only the
> skeleton from module::starter.
Well, I suppose it's better that I sent the wrong tarball here, rather
than uploading it to CPAN, but it's still embarrassing.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 3:15 AM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> use lib 't/lib';
> chdir 't';
> require Some::Module::In::t::lib;
>
> lib.pm does not make the directory absolute, so it leaves your program
> vulnerable to the above problem. Its rare you'd have to require instead of
> use, some load orde
Erik Osheim writes:
> Greetings!
>
> This email is to announce a new testing framework that I wrote (based
> on Test::Builder), which I have tentatively called Test::Functional (as
> in functional programming). Before finalizing it and uploading it to
> CPAN and I figured I'd email you folks to ge
10 matches
Mail list logo
