Re: Can TAP::Harness::Archive be made to play well with TAP::Parser::Aggregate

2011-10-27 Thread James E Keenan
This is now available on CPAN: http://search.cpan.org/dist/TAP-Harness-Multiple/ Tested on Linux and Darwin but not yet on Windows. Thank you very much. Jim Keenan

Re: Event handling: One method per event or one method for all?

2011-10-27 Thread Michael G Schwern
On 2011.10.27 12:36 AM, chromatic wrote: > I've done this several times. I prefer one method per type of event (hello, > cheap and easy polymorphism!). Yeah, that's my thinking. One method for all makes overriding next to impossible. > This is also one case in which I find an abstract base cl

Re: An --exclude parameter for prove?

2011-10-27 Thread Steffen Schwigon
Dan Wright writes: > Hello, > > I'm curious if a patch for prove that included an --exclude parameter > would be welcome? I haven't heard a clear Yes yet. So: Yes! IMHO it is a useful idea. The minor challenge is in implementing it platform independent. The major challenge is to learn from histo

Re: Event handling: One method per event or one method for all?

2011-10-27 Thread chromatic
On Wednesday, October 26, 2011 at 09:58 PM, Michael G wrote: > So now the question is one of good event handler design, which I don't have > experience with. How does one design a good event handler? Is the pattern > one method per type of event? Or one method to do the dispatching? Or > somet