On 2011.11.5 5:23 AM, James E Keenan wrote:
> Does anyone actually use t/test.pl? What does it do? What is it for?
test.pl has the classic meaning of pl meaning "Perl Library" not the
bastardized "Perl Executable". It's a simpler, parallel alternative to
Test::More written using simpler Perl fe
On 2011.11.5 12:37 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
> * Michael G Schwern [2011-11-04 04:45]:
>> When doing delegation I have a documentation dilemma: do the API docs
>> go in the delegator or the delegate?
>
> This is the classic reference vs tutorial dilemma, isn’t it?
Not quite. I'd still like
* Michael G Schwern [2011-11-04 04:45]:
> When doing delegation I have a documentation dilemma: do the API docs
> go in the delegator or the delegate?
This is the classic reference vs tutorial dilemma, isn’t it?
The direct conclusion is that you want to have separate documentation
for the two di
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 1:23 PM, James E Keenan wrote:
> In a github issue (https://github.com/schwern/test-more/issues/73), Michael
> Schwern argued that Test::Builder2 ought to be tested with a "completely
> unrelated test system. We have one, t/test.pl from the Perl core."
>
> I thought to mysel
In a github issue (https://github.com/schwern/test-more/issues/73),
Michael Schwern argued that Test::Builder2 ought to be tested with a
"completely unrelated test system. We have one, t/test.pl from the Perl
core."
I thought to myself, "How difficult could that be?" I vaguely
remembered tes
