On 11/14/11 7:59 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Having a parallel and featureful testing system is very useful. I use it to
test Test::More (in the Test-Builder1.5 branch). Others might find it useful
to do the same.
t/test.pl is very important to the Perl core tests, but it is largely
undocumen
Having a parallel and featureful testing system is very useful. I use it to
test Test::More (in the Test-Builder1.5 branch). Others might find it useful
to do the same.
t/test.pl is very important to the Perl core tests, but it is largely
undocumented and untested. Going through the p5p process
- Original Message -
> From: Michael G Schwern
>
> On 2011.11.14 12:41 AM, Philippe Bruhat (BooK) wrote:
>> I'm more annoyed with the version number being part of the name.
>> Even if I can understand the reason why (CPAN only knows one way to
>> upgrade: up).
>
> I used to be with y
On 2011.11.14 12:41 AM, Philippe Bruhat (BooK) wrote:
> I'm more annoyed with the version number being part of the name.
> Even if I can understand the reason why (CPAN only knows one way to
> upgrade: up).
I used to be with you there.
I've since found it's a remarkably simple and foolproof way t
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:02:46 +0100
Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 07:11:28PM -0800, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>
> > In the interest of saving my hands, and the hands of test module authors,
> > I'm
> > considering changing the namespace from Test::Builder2 to just TB2. Like
> >
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 08:02:46AM +0100, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 07:11:28PM -0800, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>
> > In the interest of saving my hands, and the hands of test module
> > authors, I'm considering changing the namespace from Test::Builder2
> > to just TB2. Like LWP
