Re: Anyone want Test::Class::Moose?

2012-12-17 Thread Ovid
Hi Mark, > > From: Mark Stosberg >As I looked more at Test::Class::Moose, one thing I really like is that >plans are completely gone. Thank you. You're welcome. They're inferred at the suite and class level, but with an implicit "done_testing()" for each method

Re: Anyone want Test::Class::Moose?

2012-12-17 Thread Mark Stosberg
On 12/15/2012 05:37 PM, Ovid wrote: > Hi Justin, > > This is something I've wondered as well. Several times when people asked me > about using Test::Class with Moose I pointed them to Test::Able, though I > confess I never used that code. Invariably they would not choose it. I think > what's go