Abe Timmerman wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I'm looking into running part of our test-suite in parallel.
> TAP::Harness understands the way we'd like the tests ordered:
>
> { seq => [
> { seq => [ glob 't/0*.t' ] },
>
Hi all,
I'm looking into running part of our test-suite in parallel.
TAP::Harness understands the way we'd like the tests ordered:
{ seq => [
{ seq => [ glob 't/0*.t' ] },
{ par => [ glob 't/1*.t' ] },
{ par => [ glob 't/{2,3,4,5,6,7,8}*.t' ] },
David Golden wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What's the 'canonical' way to check to see if my tests are being run by a
>> smoker? I can't find anything in Test::Smoke about this (I might be blind).
>
> At least for CPAN Testers, the canonical way is $
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andy Armstrong wrote:
Hi Andy,
> On 9 Sep 2007, at 13:24, Abe Timmerman wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>
>> Sorry for the long output, but I hope it helps to state my confusion.
>
>> I see no failing tests, yet it states "
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Sorry for the long output, but I hope it helps to state my confusion.
I see no failing tests, yet it states "Failed 5/57 testprograms"
t\00wmcheck#
# Tk platform:MSWin32
# XFT:no
t\00wmcheck...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ovid wrote:
>
> Andy (Armstrong), aside from the fact that we now know that it fails
> miserably on VMS, do you know of any show stoppers or potential
> embarrassments?
s!fails miserably!does not work at all!
Any platform without $Config{d_fork} wi
Op een mooie winterdag (Friday 19 January 2007 16:47),schreef Ovid:
> --- demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> > Likewise you should review the work of the smoke suite for handling
> > oddball cases like VMS, you certainly shouldnt think that windows
> > will
> > be the oddest platform y
Ovid wrote:
--- demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[SNIP]
Likewise you should review the work of the smoke suite for handling
oddball cases like VMS, you certainly shouldnt think that windows
will
be the oddest platform your code will run on if it is core
integrated.
Well, so far, I have o
Ovid wrote:
--- demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[SNIP]
Likewise you should review the work of the smoke suite for handling
oddball cases like VMS, you certainly shouldnt think that windows
will
be the oddest platform your code will run on if it is core
integrated.
Well, so far, I have o
Op een mooie lentedag (Monday 08 May 2006 20:01),schreef Gabor Szabo:
> I checked it again, one can download the source code of their service
> from here http://validator.w3.org/source/
> and it is even packaged in some of the linux distros.
>
> (It is of course slightly outdated on Debian)
>
> So
Op een mooie winterdag (Monday 24 April 2006 00:21),schreef Abe Timmerman:
> Op een mooie winterdag (Sunday 23 April 2006 17:30),schreef Steve Peters:
I am so sorry, I got you mixed up with the other Steve (Hay that
Op een mooie winterdag (Sunday 23 April 2006 17:30),schreef Steve Peters:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Automated smoke report for 5.9.4 patch 27938
> > kirk: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.00GHz (GenuineIntel 1994MHz) (i686/1 cpu)
> > onlinux - 2.6.15-20-386 [debian]
> > using cc
Op een zonnige zomerdag (Monday 02 August 2004 01:25), schreef Jim Cromie:
> for various reasons, it would be nice to have a newsgroup,
> ex this one (perl.test, but sending failed), or perhaps
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], that gets full-reports for smoke-tests when
> something breaks.
http://www
Op een druilerige winterdag (Wednesday 10 March 2004 12:00), schreef Rafael
Garcia-Suarez:
> Abe Timmerman wrote in perl.daily-build :
> >> The recent smoke failures noticed by Merijn are reproducible with
> >> the environment variables
> >> PERL_UNICODE=&qu
Op een druilerige winterdag (Monday 19 January 2004 19:10), schreef Gabor
Szabo:
> If this is OT, please point me to some better place to find an answer.
>
> I am looking for a way to functional and load test a web site.
>
> On the functional level:
> Basic things can be achieved by WWW::Mechaniz
Op een winterige herfstdag (Thursday 18 December 2003 22:44), schreef Randal
L. Schwartz:
> > "Michael" == Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Michael> If you're not planning on your tests modifying the test tree at
> all, Michael> you can probably just get away with having t/tr
Op een zonnige zomerdag (Monday 18 August 2003 21:48), schreef Thomas
Klausner:
> Hi!
>
> Just yesterday I was thinking of something like validator.cpan.org
> (parallel to validator.w3.org):
>
> Upload a dist and let it be checked by a future version of Module::CPANTS.
>
> You should get back a r
Op een zonnige zomerdag (Sunday 03 August 2003 10:42), schreef Leon Brocard:
> Leon Brocard sent the following bits through the ether:
> > Secondly, who do I need to convince to add the "make test" results for
> > PASSes too? ;-)
>
> So, does anyone actually have an opinion on this?
If you are ta
Op een zonnige zomerdag (Friday 27 June 2003 20:26), schreef John Peacock:
> Abe Timmerman wrote:
> > T::S::S::Hardlink uses *all* of the source directory, so if you are using
> > a working copy (under version control) the MANIFEST check will report all
> > .svn stuff in the
Op een zonnige zomerdag (Friday 27 June 2003 17:19), schreef John Peacock:
> Now that I have a subversion repository of the APC (All Perl Changes) on a
> machine that is largely unloaded, I can set up a smoke process nightly. In
> order to do that, I have a couple of questions:
>
> 1) When runnin
Op een zonnige winterdag (Monday 10 February 2003 19:17), schreef alian:
> The uploaded file
>
> Test-Smoke-Database-1.5.tar.gz
>
> has entered CPAN as
>
>file: $CPAN/authors/id/A/AL/ALIAN/Test-Smoke-Database-1.5.tar.gz
>size: 28921 bytes
Great! It is getting better all the the time.
Op een mooie herfstdag (Thursday 24 October 2002 19:01), schreef Alain BARBET:
> After some tests with Borland:
> An extra line in smoke.mk in CFG_VARS is created empty.
> Something like:
>
> CFG_VARS
> =
> \
> ~ \
> osvers=4.
Op een mooie herfstdag (Wednesday 23 October 2002 21:43), schreef Alain
BARBET:
> Abe Timmerman wrote:
> > It took some time as the daytime job drained my energy :-(
>
> Sorry to not reply more quickly to your mail. Thanks to take time for
> the perl smoke database
&g
Op een mooie herfstdag (Monday 30 September 2002 14:05), schreef Alain BARBET:
> > BTW, How is the smokereports website comming?
>
> Fine even if I have had no time this last week-end to work on it.
>
> > Are you going to maintain it for the community?
>
> Yes, but some work must be done:
That i
Op een mooie herfstdag (Tuesday 24 September 2002 17:57), schreef H.Merijn
Brand:
> 2. I'm testing conversions to and from Unicode
>
> --8<---
> use Test::More tests => 86;
>
> use strict;
>
> BEGIN {
> use_ok ("PROCURA::Diac", 4.12);
> SKIP: {
> $^V ge v5.8.0 or skip "Need 5.8.0
Op een mooie herfstdag (Monday 23 September 2002 16:14), schreef Alain Barbet:
> Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> http://www.alianwebserver.com/cgi-bin/smoke_db
>
> > Looks great! Some suggestions/questions:
> > - freebsd os version missing?
>
> Yes it's missing info from Nicolas Clark reports.
Tha
Op een mooie dag (Sun, 16 Dec 2001 15:30:17 -0500), besloot Michael G Schwern
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> de wereld om te draaien en schreef:
> > Sorry, I did look into the failed tests, but I don't understand the
> > Test::Harness::Straps::analyze_file() logic. MSWin32 doesn't support the open()
> > c
Op een mooie dag (Sun, 16 Dec 2001 00:47:17 -0500), schreef Michael G Schwern
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The second [1] Test::Harness 2.00 release candidate just went up to CPAN
> http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/src/Test-Harness-2.00_04.tar.gz
> Simply install the module, let me know if it wen
28 matches
Mail list logo
