w how to discover the -I options that I was
KS> called with. Any ideas?
I ran into that problem with some code I was developing, and I belive
I posted a feature request, that there should be some way of getting
the full command line arguments back.
--
Chaim Frenkel
teresting or useful would be to have
another undef type. Call it uninit. THis would be only used for data
that hasn't been initialized. Then there would be two warnings one
for unitialized and one for using undef.
It might be better done by doing some kind of dataflow, but that is
tricky.
ne that I like the most. I'm usually marshalling
large quantities of data, and I like to know (or at least be able
to backtrack) when some piece of data was missing.
--
Chaim FrenkelNonlinear Knowledge, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-718-236-0183
Perhaps if -w has a level. (Somewhat coarser than lexical. With a family
of these 'known' warnings not emitted.)
--
Chaim FrenkelNonlinear Knowledge, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-718-236-0183
t.)
I don't think telling folks to add a no warnings to the code just before
release, is the way. PERL5OPT seems a bit of the wrong approach.
And the -M-warnings, is taking up a lot of room on the #! line.
*sigh*
--
Chaim Frenkel
alpha and beta testing, the conditionals would be active
and verifying the specifications. During ship and user testing, they
would be off.
--
Chaim FrenkelNonlinear Knowledge, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-718-236-0183
hand holding. With an active style sheet (i.e. embedded
perl code) it may be doable by a generic parser/emitter.
But I'm no SGML/XML/ whateverML guru.
--
Chaim FrenkelNonlinear Knowledge, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-718-236-0183
>>>>> "MGS" == Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MGS> On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 09:01:22PM -0400, Chaim Frenkel wrote:
>> If you do this for new code or changed documentation adding
>> a =for result would add more test cases.
MGS> Sor
; == Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MGS> On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 08:51:18PM -0400, Chaim Frenkel wrote:
>> I'd like to reject the philosophy. I'd prefer that the language define
>> perl. I.e. not an implementation. Rather the spec.
>>
>> Shou
I haven't seen any responses to my responses to the RFC. Is this list working?
Or is it my software?
P.S. Why is this perl-qa? Shouldn't it be perl6-qa?
--
Chaim FrenkelNonlinear Knowledge, Inc.
[EMAIL
GS> =pod
MGS> Here is a nice example of how to add one and one in Perl.
MGS> =for example
MGS> print 2 + 2;
MGS> The existing POD utilities would have to be modified to consider "=for
MGS> example" as Perl
sing almost the entire range of Perl and all with the same output!
--
Chaim FrenkelNonlinear Knowledge, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-718-236-0183
ance. Period.
MGS> While this may seem draconian, it should rapidly raise the overall quality
MGS> of the patches by forcing authors to do more than dash off a little C code.
--
Chaim FrenkelNonlinear Knowledge, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-718-236-0183
13 matches
Mail list logo
