I was a little surprised that when module A is used by module B and
module B is used by modules C,D,E,F,G there is no indication of the
requirement by C,D,E,F,G on http://cpants.perl.org/dist/used_by/A
I think a "cascading use" list would be useful on the used_by pages on CPANTS.
On 7/5/05, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "I feel your pain and I will share it". How far each author goes down
> the backwards compatibility route is obviously up to them, and as a
> volunteer effort no one has any right to get upset about their decision.
Wasn't one of the goals of C