Re: Idea: CPAN Category Reviews

2008-04-06 Thread Guy Hulbert
On Sun, 2008-06-04 at 19:25 -0400, Guy Hulbert wrote: > Jonathan Rockaway Sorry. Should have been 'Rockway'. -- --gh

Re: Idea: CPAN Category Reviews

2008-04-06 Thread Guy Hulbert
On Sun, 2008-06-04 at 23:47 +0200, Philippe Bruhat (BooK) wrote: > > It still looks like a big job to me. > > > > Kobesearch's sources are available. See Jonathan Rockaway's last reply in this thread. His stuff looks really good. He pointed me to this (offlist): http://git.jrock.us/?p=MetaCP

Re: Changing the focus of the chronic CPAN problem

2008-04-05 Thread Guy Hulbert
On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 13:42 -0500, Andy Lester wrote: > On Apr 5, 2008, at 1:34 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote: > > Thanks for the comments. See below for my response. It will be a > > rather > > stream-of-consciousness thing, but I hope something can come up of > it. > > > I've expanded my original com

Re: Changing the focus of the chronic CPAN problem

2008-04-05 Thread Guy Hulbert
On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 21:34 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote: > Anyway, I'll probably set up a wiki page about it, so we can > brain-storm more easily. I will contribute when it's available then. -- --gh

Re: Idea: CPAN Category Reviews

2008-04-05 Thread Guy Hulbert
On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 15:16 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote: > Why do you feel my previous email was not concise or definite? I admit coulda woulda shoulda ... > it was > a sort-of brainstorming email, but it was not too long. If you want a this reply is even longer ;-) > one > paragraph summary t

Re: Idea: CPAN Category Reviews

2008-04-05 Thread Guy Hulbert
On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 16:54 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote: > On Saturday 05 April 2008, Guy Hulbert wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 15:16 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote: > > > one > > > paragraph summary then: > > > > > > <<<<<<<<<&

Re: Idea: CPAN Category Reviews

2008-04-05 Thread Guy Hulbert
On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 12:21 -0500, Jonathan Rockway wrote: > > So what do you think - is there an interest in this? > > I think you should just do it. Then we can see if there is interest or > not. I will be doing the part I volunteered for ... sooner or later even if it's just for my own use.

Re: Idea: CPAN Category Reviews

2008-04-05 Thread Guy Hulbert
On Sat, 2008-05-04 at 14:02 +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote: > Hi all! > > In regards to the previous discussion about trimming down CPAN and finding I don't think trimming is necessary if you are successful with this. IMO the problem is just finding things, which your proposal addresses. > better way