Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 07:52:22PM -0500, Christopher H. Laco wrote:
Michael G Schwern wrote:
Until such time as there are test_* flags, one should take a pragmatic
view.
And that view is what is going to cause the least amount of hassle for
those who want to
Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 12:06:36AM +1100, Andrew Savige wrote:
However, I was wondering if there is a standard, safe way of testing
simple .pl scripts?
Hmmm. The identical question was asked a bit over a week ago:
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qa/3722
I
chromatic wrote:
I've been writing notes for Test::Builder for Perl 6, though. It's a
little something like:
How is CPAN going to support simultaneous development of perl 5 and 6
versions of modules?
-ofer
David Golden wrote:
Just to be playful with concepts:
* Test::Answer -- holds the details of a particular test
(pass/fail/skip/todo)
* Test::Scoresheet -- holds a collection of Test::Answers
* Test::Booklet -- sets up a default Test::ScoreSheet object to hold
results, creates and maintains new
Cdric Bouvier wrote:
I think I will call it Run::Distributed after all.
http://search.cpan.org/search?query=%5Erun%3A%3Amode=module
Looks like there's no Run::* namespace yet, and you usually need a
pretty good justification to start a new namespace.
If your module is just a generic way to
One issue I've always struggled with is how to properly test code that's
not in the form of a module - in other words, scripts. I use the usual
hacky, temporary methods to test my code as I write it or when I find a
bug (pring statements, commenting out things, etc), and occasionally the
perl
Michael G Schwern wrote:
Now, nobody says this means your program has to be split up into a whole
bunch of files and become a full fledged module. You can write something
like this.
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use Getopt::Long;
my %Opts;
GetOptions(\%Opts, test);
I've been reading up on perl test tools all day, and I have a question
about Test::More.
Doesn't is_deeply do everything eq_array and eq_hash does and more? It
looks like is_deeply has the same exact interface and purpose, except
that it accepts both arrayrefs and hashrefs. So why would you
Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
I'd make that just:
sub main {
...the program using the functions below...
}
main() unless caller;
sub some_function { ... }
sub some_other_function { ... }
Nice trick. I just tested it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/test] cat foo.pl
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use strict;
Shawn Sorichetti wrote:
Test::Output 0.05 has been released.
The main difference in this version is a patch from chromatic (thank
you). His patch fixed a bug where all tests printed error diags even
if they passed. Additional tests were added to ensure that no output
is sent from diag in
Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 04:27:07PM -0800, Ofer Nave wrote:
Random thought: Could Devel::Cover be automatically run against all
modules in CPAN, with ratings posted on cpan.org right next to the usual
test results?
It still chokes on certain not uncommon
I've written a new module for CPAN called Parallel::Simple. It's my
first CPAN module, and I have not yet uploaded it because I have not yet
written any formal tests for it (although I use it in production
currently). I've also never written any formal tests in perl at all
(using the Test::*
David Golden wrote:
Ofer Nave wrote:
I've written a new module for CPAN called Parallel::Simple. It's my
first CPAN module, and I have not yet uploaded it because I have not
yet written any formal tests for it (although I use it in production
currently). I've also never written any formal
13 matches
Mail list logo
