assuming that everyone is competitive. I'm not, and so I'm
not about to crank out 62 new releases just because my distributions
aren't up with the current fashions in cargo-culted tests.
--
Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
#x27;s an eventual TODO-list item to steal/use the PPI
parser from Claes' CPANXR rather than compiling the code. The
compilation is there to answer the question "what methods does package
X define".
--
Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
eed to know what they are. Can you
offer pointers?
--
Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
have to
delete 3 things (dist, .meta and .readme) where before I only needed
to worry about the one. That's only a downside because I'm as
insufficiently lazy to automate that.
--
Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
val {
local $ENV{PERL5OPT} = "-MDevel::Cover=-summary,0";
$self->ACTION_test(@_);
};
system qw( cover -report html );
}
--
Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
it at 80%.
But now, I'm just having a thought. It could be useful to have
another class of test just beyond TODO, maybe a WOULDBENICE test, so
it WOULDBENICE if coverage was at 100%, but it not being isn't a
failure. Maybe that's a bit warm and fuzzy. Hey, I never said it was
a good thought.
--
Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
so at:
http://unixbeard.net/~richardc/lab/Pod-Coverage/Pod-Coverage-0.11.tar.gz
--
Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
tance tree (it walks @ISA).
Refactored "_get_pods" into its own method to allow this.
On your local CPAN mirror very soon, or here sooner:
http://unixbeard.net/~richardc/lab/Pod-Coverage/Pod-Coverage-0.10.tar.gz
--
Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
g to
conferences and practice breaking things.
While the thought is in my brain, are you planning to talk at any
conferences this year? I know I'd like to see a Devel::Cover
flavoured talk, and I suspect I'm not alone.
It's also helped me enough recently retrofitting tests to some
messy,
and guaranteed fragile, but it works for me, and that's a step
forwards.
In Makefile.PL add:
sub MY::postamble {
return < and poke around at the generated Foo.xs.gcov
results.
--
Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
umentation in a parent class to be counted in
the coverage of the child has started to tingle (aka as making
Pod::Coverage grok inheritance), so that'll be the main target of
the next bunch of stuff.
--
Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
you
reckon for the chances of wrangling back as far as 5.005_03[0]
[0] said version of perl may resemble employers production systems,
contents may have settled in transit, your home is at risk.
--
Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
nated.
--
Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 09:48:24PM -0700, chromatic wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Dec 2001 12:04:27 -0700, Richard Clamp wrote:
>
> When I was writing tests for libnet, Graham recommended not to chdir() into 't'
> for testing outside of the core. I'd probably move that insi
pick up your very own Term::ReadLine::*
implementation, should you really want to.
Does it look like I'm heading down the right road with this? If so
let me know and I'll submit it to p5p for applying to blead.
--
Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -ub 'bleadperl-
On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 03:57:48PM -0400, Kirrily 'Skud' Robert wrote:
> Also, there's some weirdness with webchatpp's generated code if your
> WWW::Chat script was inside subroutines (or presumably other blocks).
> Here's a real life example:
> [snippage]
> It would be nice if we could get this t
#!/usr/local/bin/perl -w
-use Test::More 'no_plan';
+use Test::More tests => 7;
package Catch;
--
Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 04:24:51PM +0200, Tels wrote:
> attached is a revised version of pod_cover.pl which you can use to test a
> whole distribution using the new v0.06 API.
Cool, may I slurp that in as another example script?
--
Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
god damn, e
orted as 0.
[0] based on code contributed by Robin Houston, who saved me a *lot*
of thinking(tm)
[1] except where void
--
Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
god damn, even superman shot himself
it much tomorrow, but next week I'm back in
the London office so I'll be able to fit some hacking in then, which
will help my stress levels no end :)
Later
[0] I only just remembered when reviewing this thread for things I
said were on the todo list.
--
Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
god damn, even superman shot himself
I don't produce that
sharpish, please slap me.
As ever, this is also available at
http://unixbeard.net/~richardc/lab/Pod-Coverage/Pod-Coverage-0.05.tar.gz
for your queue-jumping pleasure.
[0] I am Jack's slack
--
Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
god damn, even superman shot himself
right fix.
That's achievable now with also_private => qr/^\(/, though I'll look
and see if that can be coped with more sensibly when I get a chance.
Sorry to be deferring on so many things this time round. I'm helluva
busy at the moment and won't have a real chance to look at anything
until tomorrow night when I get back home.
--
Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 10:46:15AM +0100, Richard Clamp wrote:
> Oddly Skud's script now segfaults under 5.6.1 while requiring the
> second module it checks. (on my box this is Archive::Tar, after
> Algorithm::MarkovChain) It didn't before so it's either something th
his is Archive::Tar, after
Algorithm::MarkovChain) It didn't before so it's either something that
Pod::Find does or I subtly broke something else. Will pore over the
diffs when I get a chance.
--
Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
happy people have no stories
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 07:56:30PM -0400, Kirrily 'Skud' Robert wrote:
> This script...
Nifty, mind if I assimilate it as an example script?
Sadly the hacking I did this morning makes it explode into bits, but
that's definitely my bad. More on that in a second.
--
Ric
s difficult as sacrificing something to the arcane ones
of Devel::*
--
Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
happy people have no stories
generating an updated README for the 0.03 release.
--
Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
happy people have no stories
Expect that
to be fixed sometime around then.
--
Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
this :)
Yup, I was mentally kicking the interface about last night. I think
there will be two ways to specify this when you call coverage, private
and also_private, where C adds to the default list of
what's private.
--
Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
d-Coverage-0.01_02.tar.gz
Caveats, this isn't heading to CPAN today at the testsuite is far from
comprehensive, and I'd like some feedback before I release it. That
and I was due to meet people at the pub an hour ago.
Testcases that fail would be greatly appreciated so I know what to
shoot
30 matches
Mail list logo
