On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 11:21:55PM +, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 08:05:28PM -0700, chromatic wrote:
> > Here's tests for ExtUtils::MM_Cygwin. They're skipped on all platforms where
> > $^O does not match /cygwin/i. The tests out to pass just about everywhere
> > anyway.
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 09:10:32PM -0700, chromatic wrote:
> On Sunday 25 November 2001 20:47, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>
> > $ENV{'ExtUtils/MM_Unix.pm'} ?? Maybe this supposed to be %INC?
>
> Indeed it is. Never patch while cursing the heavy hand of George Lucas.
Hard to code while beating t
On Sunday 25 November 2001 20:47, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> $ENV{'ExtUtils/MM_Unix.pm'} ?? Maybe this supposed to be %INC?
Indeed it is. Never patch while cursing the heavy hand of George Lucas.
> You should be playing with MM objects instead. ExtUtils::MM_Cygwin
> will handle setting @MM::
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 08:05:28PM -0700, chromatic wrote:
> +BEGIN {
> + if ($^O =~ /cygwin/i) {
> + plan tests => 17;
> + $ENV{'ExtUtils/MM_Unix.pm'} = 1;
$ENV{'ExtUtils/MM_Unix.pm'} ?? Maybe this supposed to be %INC?
> +# test cflags, with the fake package below
Here's tests for ExtUtils::MM_Cygwin. They're skipped on all platforms where
$^O does not match /cygwin/i. The tests out to pass just about everywhere
anyway.
It would be good for someone with Cygwin to test them, though.
-- c
--- ~MANIFEST Sun Nov 25 19:50:46 2001
+++ MANIFESTSun Nov 2
