Dave Mitchell wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 07:23:31PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>> Craig A. Berry wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
This is a quick release to sync with perl so 5.10.1 can release with a
stable
version number. It does NOT
Dave Mitchell wrote:
> So unless some other problem comes up, then 0.91 should match both those
> goals and everyone's happy.
0.92 is on its way to CPAN with Craig's fixes.
http://github.com/schwern/test-more/tree/v0.92
--
A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow o
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 01:03:59PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Dave Mitchell wrote:
> > So unless some other problem comes up, then 0.91 should match both those
> > goals and everyone's happy.
>
> 0.92 is on its way to CPAN with Craig's fixes.
>
> http://github.com/schwern/test-more/tree/v0
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 11:11:53AM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> We're back in the same place as before. Its just a couple of little test
> fixes. You can apply them or I can make another release.
>
> Since its easy enough to make a release now days I'll just do it. But I feel
> like we're
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 01:03:59PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Dave Mitchell wrote:
> > So unless some other problem comes up, then 0.91 should match both those
> > goals and everyone's happy.
>
> 0.92 is on its way to CPAN with Craig's fixes.
>
> http://github.com/schwern/test-more/tree/v0
Dave Mitchell wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 01:03:59PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>> Dave Mitchell wrote:
>>> So unless some other problem comes up, then 0.91 should match both those
>>> goals and everyone's happy.
>> 0.92 is on its way to CPAN with Craig's fixes.
>>
>> http://github.com/sc
