On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 12:16:58AM -0400, Ivan Tubert-Brohman wrote:
> On 10/6/06, Ivan Tubert-Brohman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I got something that can send you directly to rt.cpan.org and prefill
> >the textarea with the patch. The problem is that that textarea has
> >hard text wrapping whic
On 10/6/06, Ivan Tubert-Brohman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I got something that can send you directly to rt.cpan.org and prefill
the textarea with the patch. The problem is that that textarea has
hard text wrapping which can cause the patch to be malformed.
Therefore, to make life easier for the
* Ivan Tubert-Brohman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-06 11:40]:
> The problem is that that textarea has hard text wrapping which
> can cause the patch to be malformed. Therefore, to make life
> easier for the module maintainer, the patch should be attached
> as a file. The sad part for the patcher is
On 10/5/06, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 04 October 2006 20:36, Ivan Tubert-Brohman wrote:
> I couldn't resist the temptation and started working on this feature.
> It's almost done now, I think it should be up by tomorrow or Friday.
No one has said this in a while, so:
Th
On Oct 4, 2006, at 3:16 PM, brian d foy wrote:
Not really. :) The spell checking is done by external programs, and
the
Pod::Spell module outputs something that doesn't have all of the
original docs in it. You can find out if there are spelling errors,
but
you don't get back something that fix
On 10/3/06, Ivan Tubert-Brohman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/3/06, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I read a lot of documentation for CPAN modules and find a fair few typos. Yet
> making patches for the POD is a hassle; I would have to download the archive,
> uncompress it, copy the fi
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chris
Dolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 3, 2006, at 3:58 PM, brian d foy wrote:
>
> > Even better would be something like Pod::Spellchecker. I've started
> > the
> > project several times but never had that much motivation to finish it.
> > Things would b
On Wednesday 04 October 2006 20:36, Ivan Tubert-Brohman wrote:
> I couldn't resist the temptation and started working on this feature.
> It's almost done now, I think it should be up by tomorrow or Friday.
No one has said this in a while, so:
Thank you! Great work!
-- c
On Oct 3, 2006, at 3:58 PM, brian d foy wrote:
Even better would be something like Pod::Spellchecker. I've started
the
project several times but never had that much motivation to finish it.
Things would be simple if it could just spell-check everything, but I
want it to be able to skip verbati
On 10/3/06, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I read a lot of documentation for CPAN modules and find a fair few typos. Yet
making patches for the POD is a hassle; I would have to download the archive,
uncompress it, copy the file, fix the typo, generate a patch, and submit it.
Wouldn't it b
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, chromatic
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wouldn't it be nice to be able to pull up a text entry box online with the
> contents of the POD, fix any typos inline, then submit it to the server which
> can generate a patch and perhaps redirect me to rt.cpan.org? I thin
Meant to send this to the list. Sorry.
Original Message
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
While we're on the subject... it would be nice if AnnoCPAN had a
checkbox "This is a bug in the module", that (if checked) autocreated an
RT ticket (in addition to posting a message) and th
I read a lot of documentation for CPAN modules and find a fair few typos. Yet
making patches for the POD is a hassle; I would have to download the archive,
uncompress it, copy the file, fix the typo, generate a patch, and submit it.
Wouldn't it be nice to be able to pull up a text entry box onl
13 matches
Mail list logo
