Re: Drizzle colonization

2008-07-27 Thread Sam Vilain
Jonathan Rockway wrote: > SQLite handles concurrent users. Some people dislike the fact that row > writes lock the entire table, though. This starts being a problem when > you are getting around 10-100 million writes a day, according to the > SQLite docs. It does support that? I thought that as

Re: Drizzle colonization

2008-07-26 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Jul 26, 2008, at 20:32, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: That has been my reaction. SQLite has far more features. Compared to a full RDBMS, SQLite is an RDBM without the S – Drizzle is more of a… DMS. Essentially it goes back to MySQL’s flatfile-with-quasi-SQL-frontend roots. Whether they take of

Re: Drizzle colonization

2008-07-26 Thread Aristotle Pagaltzis
* David E. Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-27 05:20]: > On Jul 25, 2008, at 19:52, Andy Lester wrote: >> I know, but that "OMG THAT'S JUST SQLITE" is the #1 comment >> I've been seeing. > > That has been my reaction. SQLite has far more features. Compared to a full RDBMS, SQLite is an RDBM wi

Re: Drizzle colonization

2008-07-26 Thread chromatic
On Saturday 26 July 2008 20:18:13 David E. Wheeler wrote: > That has been my reaction. I do assume, though, that aside from > Jonathan Rockaway's comments that seem to justify the suspicion that > it's just MySQLite, that the major difference will be that Drizzle > (terrible name, BTW) will be a c

Re: Drizzle colonization

2008-07-26 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Jul 25, 2008, at 19:52, Andy Lester wrote: It's more than that. I know, but that "OMG THAT'S JUST SQLITE" is the #1 comment I've been seeing. That has been my reaction. I do assume, though, that aside from Jonathan Rockaway's comments that seem to justify the suspicion that it's jus

Re: Drizzle colonization

2008-07-26 Thread Jonathan Rockway
* On Fri, Jul 25 2008, Andy Lester wrote: > Drizzle is the new fork of MySQL that removes many many features to > save weight, but is still able to handle concurrent users unlike > SQLite. SQLite handles concurrent users. Some people dislike the fact that row writes lock the entire table, though.

Re: Drizzle colonization

2008-07-26 Thread Andy Armstrong
On 26 Jul 2008, at 03:36, Andy Lester wrote: Drizzle is the new fork of MySQL that removes many many features to save weight, but is still able to handle concurrent users unlike SQLite. http://developers.slashdot.org/developers/08/07/23/1234203.shtml The current MySQL testing system is done

Re: Drizzle colonization

2008-07-25 Thread chromatic
On Friday 25 July 2008 19:52:55 Andy Lester wrote: > On Jul 25, 2008, at 9:48 PM, chromatic wrote: > > Lovely. Let me know if I can help. (I had lunch with Brian Aker > > today; he wanted some independent review from someone from a very > > different but similar world.) > Review of what? The p

Re: Drizzle colonization

2008-07-25 Thread Andy Lester
On Jul 25, 2008, at 9:48 PM, chromatic wrote: Drizzle is the new fork of MySQL that removes many many features to save weight, but is still able to handle concurrent users unlike SQLite. It's more than that. I know, but that "OMG THAT'S JUST SQLITE" is the #1 comment I've been seeing.

Re: Drizzle colonization

2008-07-25 Thread chromatic
On Friday 25 July 2008 19:36:48 Andy Lester wrote: > Drizzle is the new fork of MySQL that removes many many features to > save weight, but is still able to handle concurrent users unlike SQLite. It's more than that. > The current MySQL testing system is done like PHP: Programs create big > ugly

Drizzle colonization

2008-07-25 Thread Andy Lester
Drizzle is the new fork of MySQL that removes many many features to save weight, but is still able to handle concurrent users unlike SQLite. http://developers.slashdot.org/developers/08/07/23/1234203.shtml The current MySQL testing system is done like PHP: Programs create big ugly files and