[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael G Schwern) writes:
> Short version: I'm considering dropping the exit code feature from the
> default behavior of Test::Builder and making it something you can turn on
> instead. Does anyone find this feature useful or otherwise wish to
> protest its removal in 0.50?
On Jul 19, 2004, at 8:09 AM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
The exit code information adds unnecessary extra information to an
already
crowded set of diagnostics. Observe the difference.
Oh, yeah, it's nice that you lose the extra two lines that I, for one,
never paid attention to, anyway.
Regards,
D
(delurking)
I always wondered what that "dubious" meant.
Mike Scott
QA Software Developer
BBC News Interactive
-Original Message-
From: Michael G Schwern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 July 2004 16:09
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Exit status code from Test::More mig
Short version: I'm considering dropping the exit code feature from the
default behavior of Test::Builder and making it something you can turn on
instead. Does anyone find this feature useful or otherwise wish to
protest its removal in 0.50?
Long version:
Test::More (and, in fact, most any Tes
