demerphq wrote:
> On 11/1/06, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This distribution uses 'test.pl' for its tests. The output of
>> 'test.pl' is not parsed. When
>> "make test" is run by automated installers (for example, the CPAN
> shell) your tests will
>> always appear to have passe
Michael G Schwern schrieb:
This doesn't really explain why test.pl is bad.
[...]
Agreed!
This distribution uses 'test.pl' for its tests. The output of 'test.pl' is not parsed. When
"make test" is run by automated installers (for example, the CPAN shell) your tests will
always appear to h
On 11/1/06, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This distribution uses 'test.pl' for its tests. The output of 'test.pl' is not
parsed. When
"make test" is run by automated installers (for example, the CPAN
shell) your tests will
always appear to have passed no matter what the output
Hi,
Michael G Schwern schrieb:
So making "no_test_pl" a kwalitee test is a good idea.
So adding this to Module::CPANTS::Kwalitee::Files in the obvious place
should do exactly that. Perhaps we should call it "old_testing_scheme"
or so instead, but I'll go with your suggestion:
{
Hi again,
Michael G Schwern schrieb:
So making "no_test_pl" a kwalitee test is a good idea.
of course, adding a mention in the docs helps, too. So I should have
made it a patch. Sorry. I didn't have the svn sources.
Hence:
=item * has_test_pl
And if people decide that this should be optio
Steffen Mueller wrote:
> {
> name=>'no_test_pl',
> error=>q{This distribution contains a file called 'test.pl' in
> its main distribution directory. This indicates that it uses the old
> style of creating test suites. Nowadays, tests belong into one or more
> *.t files in the t/
