On 7/7/06, Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This long-winded (as usual) explanation brings me around to my actual question: is
there really any need to have the lexing and parsing stages clearly delineated? I can't
see why, but from you mentioning several times that "that's a parser's job, no
- Original Message
From: Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Also, since I had not seen the TAP::Harness work before, I didn't
> know that a separate parser was already being planned. My only
> motivation for writing TAP::Parser was my assumption that it was
> needed and was not going to otherwis
- Original Message
From: Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 7/4/06, Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Because we're discarding anything which does not look like a plan or a test
> > line
>
> Don't discard them, just pass them through unaltered. Don't want to
> lose any informat
On 7/4/06, Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Because we're discarding anything which does not look like a plan or a test line
Don't discard them, just pass them through unaltered. Don't want to
lose any information. The /^#/ lines should be marked as comments.
Anything else is marked as junk bu
Hi all,
I'm going to be heading out town tonight and will be gone for the next two
days, but don't take my silence to mean that I've dropped this. I have started
on the TAP::Parser module and have the lexer *mostly* working. There are a
couple of extra tests I need to write for it and it will
