Re: Multi-Core Tests

2011-07-18 Thread Eric Wilhelm
# from Eden Cardim # on Monday 18 July 2011 11:53: >> Moving out of the realm of what you can do today, it may be >> worth adding a key to the meta file which indicates the >> tests are not safe for parallel testing. > >I'm not sure I see how to accomplish that, given the meta file is > under the

Re: Multi-Core Tests

2011-07-18 Thread Eden Cardim
> "Michael" == Michael G Schwern writes: Michael> Just to make sure, when you say "using several cores" you mean testing in Michael> parallel? Like setting the jobs flag (or -j with prove)? Yes exactly. Michael> I don't like work arounds for test failures, and what Michael>

Re: Multi-Core Tests

2011-07-17 Thread Paul Johnson
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 11:47:52AM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote: > Moving out of the realm of what you can do today, it may be worth adding a key > to the meta file which indicates the tests are not safe for parallel testing. > > I prefer this over the inverse (a flag stating that the tests ARE

Re: Multi-Core Tests

2011-07-17 Thread Michael G Schwern
On 2011.7.14 6:00 PM, Eden Cardim wrote: > It appears there are several distributions on CPAN whose tests don't > pass when using several cores. This is an annoyance because some of the > larger deplists nearly always have a module with broken tests in them, > so testing can't just be a fire-and-fo

Multi-Core Tests

2011-07-14 Thread Eden Cardim
Hello Everyone, It appears there are several distributions on CPAN whose tests don't pass when using several cores. This is an annoyance because some of the larger deplists nearly always have a module with broken tests in them, so testing can't just be a fire-and-forget operation, it also confuse