On Mar 4, 2005, at 4:07 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 11:47:31AM -0600, Ken Williams wrote:
Better would be to snark it from ExtUtils::CBuilder, which has a
has_compiler() method.
How portable is this? I see there's some minimal VMS and OS/2 code in
there, will it work?
It s
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 11:47:31AM -0600, Ken Williams wrote:
> Better would be to snark it from ExtUtils::CBuilder, which has a
> has_compiler() method.
How portable is this? I see there's some minimal VMS and OS/2 code in
there, will it work?
If so then the MakeMaker tests can just use have_c
On Feb 23, 2005, at 6:08 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
For any brave Phalanx folks who wish to target MakeMaker I can point
you at
some critically deficient areas of its testing.
1) XS. There is absolutely no testing of XS code. The primary
problem is
determining if the user has a working buil
For any brave Phalanx folks who wish to target MakeMaker I can point you at
some critically deficient areas of its testing.
1) XS. There is absolutely no testing of XS code. The primary problem is
determining if the user has a working build chain. I think Module::Build
has code to do this and