On Oct 4, 2006, at 13:18, brian d foy wrote:
I tried those a long time ago. I wanted something interactive that
doesn't rely on external programs.
It should probably use Text::Aspell under the hood, if it can.
Best,
David
In article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ivan
Tubert-Brohman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> brian d foy wrote:
> "Even better would be something like Pod::Spellchecker. I've started the
> project several times but never had that much motivation to finish it.
> Things would be simple if it could just spell-c
In addition to my own modules, I've used it on Perl::Critic and PPI and
(aside from Adam Kennedy's weird Aussie spelling!) and it worked great.
That's about 29,000 lines of well-documented code -- I'm not sure if you
consider that large or not. Perl::Critic currently has 29 stopwords not
incl
On Oct 4, 2006, at 3:29 PM, Ovid wrote:
--- Ivan Tubert-Brohman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Have you tried Pod::Spell and Test::Spelling? I think they already do
that.
I've tried Test::Spelling only to discover that there are so many
exceptions which it doesn't recognize that it was very pain
Ovid wrote:
> --- Ivan Tubert-Brohman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Have you tried Pod::Spell and Test::Spelling? I think they already do
>> that.
>
> I've tried Test::Spelling only to discover that there are so many
> exceptions which it doesn't recognize that it was very painful to try
> and inc
--- Ivan Tubert-Brohman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Have you tried Pod::Spell and Test::Spelling? I think they already do
> that.
I've tried Test::Spelling only to discover that there are so many
exceptions which it doesn't recognize that it was very painful to try
and include in a test suite.
brian d foy wrote:
"Even better would be something like Pod::Spellchecker. I've started the
project several times but never had that much motivation to finish it.
Things would be simple if it could just spell-check everything, but I
want it to be able to skip verbatim blocks, things in C<>, and s
