On Apr 17, 2008, at 12:48 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Chris Dolan wrote:
Interesting reactions:
* People were appalled that Test::Class invokes methods in
alphabetic order instead of lexical order
It seems odd to me that people would be so concerned about the
order of execution, given th
--- Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems odd to me that people would be so concerned about the order
> of
> execution, given the methods should be able to be executed in any
> order. Any
> idea why that was an issue?
It's an issue when you have multiple startup/setup/teardow
Chris Dolan wrote:
Interesting reactions:
* People were appalled that Test::Class invokes methods in alphabetic
order instead of lexical order
It seems odd to me that people would be so concerned about the order of
execution, given the methods should be able to be executed in any order. Any
On 17 Apr 2008, at 06:48, Chris Dolan wrote:
[snip]
Interesting reactions:
* People were appalled that Test::Class invokes methods in
alphabetic order instead of lexical order
If it's any comfort so is the author :-) At some point I'll be
changing T::C to follow lexical-order-by-class met
I made a presentation to Madison.pm (Madmongers.org) on software
testing in general and Perl testing in particular. It was intended
to be introductory since many Madmongers are casual Perl users and
most do not have the testing religion. After discussing reasons for
and types of testing,
